Fascinating dynamic unfolding across Mastodon: instances are dividing into two ideological factions: safe speech, and free speech.

The safe speech instances are likely to start sharing domain-level blocklists (like Adblock but for speech) in the near future, to "curb harassment".

The free speech instances legitimately don't seem to care, and so far, have held much more interesting, substantive and intellectual conversations than the safe speech zones.

What can you expect from me? Free speech.

@wogan I see this as an internal dispute of the steadily shrinking English-language minority of Mastodon. Neither side of it has yet really processed the fact that they aren't still the majority, but anyone who wants a clear view of the situation *must* be aware of that fact.

@mattskala That's a good point, though there's a lot more to it than that.

The fediverse has been around sine Laconica (10-ish years), and it's only recently that there's a clash between the safe-space culture from the US, meeting the existing global free-speech culture, in the context of a foreign culture now dominating in user size.

Essentially, this is the new Wild West right now.

@wogan @mattskala @yahananxie I'm kind of glad that I'm not the only one who sees the US cultural influence in what's essentially a culture war over speech norms.

Something the Americans fail to realize is that much of the European segment already has hate speech laws that apply where our servers are operating and don't actually need the Americans to come tell us what we're allowed to say.

@frankiesaxx @mattskala @yahananxie Europe is actually quite ahead on a lot of this stuff, but I think you'll find some solid disagreement on the way certain types of speech are handled.

For example, the mass immigration from the middle east. It's becoming political (and social) suicide to say anything bad (even if it's true) about immigrants.

@wogan @mattskala @yahananxie That's not actually true.

It's (sometimes) political/social suicide to indulge in xenophobic scapegoating. (Or should be, in an ideal world. If you look at Hungary & Poland, the UK, etc. clearly it's not.)

Sane conversations about issues with immigration that aren't based in hyperbolic nationalist fear-mongering are pretty common; we just aren't all as hysterically terrified of foreign-talking brown people as the US wants us to be.

@frankiesaxx @wogan @mattskala @yahananxie as someone who is from Hungary I can tell you the state sanction xenophobia and hate incitement is overwhelming – I come to mastodon to escape that and not to find a new version of speech controls. The phrase 'Don't be a Dick' should always be universally followed, however.

@jd @wogan @mattskala @yahananxie

Hungary has a lot of problems right now. :(

@frankiesaxx @jd @mattskala @yahananxie South Africa is the same. We have a ruling party happy to incite race-based hatred against white people to cover up for 22+ years of governance failure.

@wogan @jd @mattskala @yahananxie

One thing US media saturation has made me aware of is the tendency to treat America's racial issues as universal, but that's not really the case.

The American cultural history of commercialized race-based slavery & segregation and its lasting social impact isn't universal; allowing the US racial narrative to define the problems in our own countries hinders our ability to accurately identify & deal with our real issues.

@frankiesaxx @jd @mattskala @yahananxie Well, as far as the US is concerned, they're basically the only country in the world so...

(I'm stereotyping of course)

@wogan @jd @mattskala @yahananxie

Haha. Yes. But it's not a completely inaccurate stereotype.

I would guess cultural and social issues around race in South Africa might identify more closely with some of the American issues because of a similar (not identical) history apartheid / segregation. But again, there are substantive differences too. As a continent, Africa has its own complex history of interrelationships too.

@frankiesaxx @wogan @mattskala @yahananxie As a yank immigrated elsewhere, it always fascinates me how people adopt the US Civil Rights narrative for themselves and their own struggles. there and many negatives and positives to this, but it would be better if people focus on their own histories first, I think.

and then they also simplify the US Civ Rts history too much, another issue.

@frankiesaxx @wogan @jd @yahananxie This was already something quite visible to us in Canada because of the proximity to the USA and our exposure to the US dialogue. Americans, from my point of view, are obsessed with black and white and that's what the word "racism" means to them. In Canada we've got plenty of racism but not divided neatly into two groups - it's the Polish v. the Portuguese v. the Somalis v. the Koreans v. the Aboriginal pe...
@yahananxie @jd @wogan @frankiesaxx one reason Black Lives Matter hasn't gotten such a warm reception in Canada, even here in Toronto, the most US-like city. Another would be their attack on Toronto Pride, but that's another story.
@mattskala @yahananxie @jd @wogan I saw about Toronto Pride. I don't really understand what happened there.
@frankiesaxx @yahananxie @jd @wogan My take on it, though I'm no expert, is that it simply came down to applying the US narrative - racism is always black versus white, everybody on "the Left" is or should be allied with each other, and the police are always the enemy of that alliance - in a place where we already have our own complex issues that don't map onto that narrative.
@mattskala @yahananxie @jd @wogan
That sounds about right; my observation is US narrative around most issues is very "black & white" -- left vs. right, us vs. them, good vs. evil... it makes for simplicity, you know which labels to apply & which flags to fly, and it's great entertainment, but ultimately it doesn't serve to help make a society cohesive. It doesn't allow for compromise or nuance. It just creates sharp lines of division.
@frankiesaxx @yahananxie @jd @wogan the only-two-sided nature of the debate is also a typically US thing but I actually meant "black and white" non-metaporically... US commentators seem to think there are only two "races," divided by skin colour, and that racism is about and only about one of those oppressing the other.
@mattskala Yeah that's them redefining "racism" to mean "systemic oppression", so that they can jusify calling everyone they don't like, racists.
@frankiesaxx @yahananxie @jd
@mattskala @yahananxie @jd @wogan I know you did :) but the reductionist treatment of race is symptomatic of an overall cultural attitude, I think.

@mattskala @yahananxie @wogan @frankiesaxx The other reason is probably that Canada cops don't kill as many black people. There is BLM in the UK, but they are focused on different issues of racism and have different tactics - including attempting to shut down Heathrow Airport, which is probably beyond conception in the USA.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/aug/05/black-lives-matter-protest-sparks-heathrow-traffic-chaos

@jd @mattskala @yahananxie @wogan @frankiesaxx
protests at UK aerodromes (both civil and military) have long history although
previously more amongst eco-protesters / against sale of mil aircrafts to nations with bad human rights records. There is some crossover between BLM and these other activists,
maybe not a bad thing as (someone from ethnic minority myself) found 80/90s era activism to be white/middle class dominated & distracted by hedonism

@mattskala @yahananxie @jd @wogan @frankiesaxx -

In Denmark we were together with Holland the avant-garde of blaming Muslims. The lesson here is that there is no alternative to free speech. If people are allowed to say what they think it creates a debate, if not it will just grow into something strange and hideous.

Beneath all the anger are things that has nothing to do with foreigners, but with inequality, angst & lack of solidarity

@frankiesaxx @wogan @yahananxie The Japanese case is interesting, especially for the current context. Last Fall I stayed in an APA Hotel in Tokyo - part of a major Japanese chain. Because nobody warned me. Here's some of the literature provided in my room. https://mstdn.io/media/jXOWosJmEx8GJqTFwEM https://mstdn.io/media/RiK0BTDmFXQkXXZY7qM https://mstdn.io/media/SBSW4MrcYh1X_9QnBuw https://mstdn.io/media/MnJ-LENQszoAmw9i1rs

@yahananxie @wogan @frankiesaxx Now, that's only one major hotel chain, and I think most Japanese consider it kind of weird. But they are able to remain in business while doing this. Nobody's being run out of town on a rail over it. And there's a nont-really-fringe ultranationalist political faction that supports that sort of thing.

Lolicon notwithstanding, US and Japanese culture have a lot of things in common.

@mattskala @yahananxie @frankiesaxx Shhhh Matt, don't be controversial

The whole "use marketing to correct history" thing is well under way here in South Africa, but I think we're learning that from the US

@mattskala @yahananxie @wogan Are you sure that isn't just left in the room by some weirdo? XD

@frankiesaxx Yes, ethnocentrism is a thing.

So is the freeze peach fallacy (believing β€œfree speech” means freedom from consequences, freedom to make people listen to you, freedom to say anything in any place, ...).

Unfortunately, it seems most of that is a front for β€œwe want to be able to engage in the same abusive behaviours as on Reddit or birbsite”...

@kellerfuchs I've noticed those tack-on freedoms often include freedom from criticism and contradiction.

I can't say I've had any exchanges here where people have been less than conversationally civil with me, even though I'm pretty sure in some cases our politics and social ideas are very different.

There's a level of get what you give too; my affinity may be more in some camps than others, but I'd be a liar if I said 'my side' never started the poo flinging.