People still fretting about "owning" their username on every instance.
<morpheus>What if I told you that you never owned your username on the birdsite in the first place?</morpheus>
People still fretting about "owning" their username on every instance.
<morpheus>What if I told you that you never owned your username on the birdsite in the first place?</morpheus>
@lmorchard i dunno, you should probably sign each toot
Kindest regards,
Les Orchard
just so people will be really, really sure
@lmorchard this. Plus, perhaps they could be acquainted with a certain weird communication medium where they also do not "own" their usernames across all servers...
...e-mail.
@lmorchard @lou1306 not a fan of fedora. too beta for me.
Oh, you mean the hat.
@thelsdj @lmorchard Based on the saga of my wife and her namesake in the UK (who thinks [REDACTED]@gmail is _her_ email address) I'm pretty well convinced this is a Hard Problem in human psychology and we're going to be grappling with it forever.
... Not shortening people's handles, ever, might educate but would probably also suck UX-wise. Allowing assignment of petnames might also help. That's all I got.
@Jesse The first part (what most people think of as username) is unique per site, but no restrictions between sites.
Your "username" is not "Jesse" - it's [email protected] and that's unique across the web