It kind of seems like if a city wants to have good bike infrastructure, there should be a mandated policy to city planners that everything should just be done the way Amsterdam does it, and only diverge from that if there's a documented really really good reason.
Going on more long urban bike rides this year in my own city, which has actually developed pretty decent infra in recent years, I'm just kind of struck by how inconsistent even the good parts are from one area to another. Like they're constantly reinventing the wheel with every new stretch of bike lane or intersection.
Which isn't just confusing for cyclists. I imagine it's pretty confusing for pedestrians and drivers who have to interact with it too.



