Citation Relevance Auditor v2 now:
- Flags when cited papers contradict the claim (not just relevant/irrelevant)
- Sharper peer-review criteria (working paper vs journal, audience fit)
- Copyright-safe — evidence database is gitignored by default
- Cleaner YAML schema for claim extraction
6-agent pipeline: outline → literature → draft → verify → review.
MIT license.
#AcademicWriting #OpenSource #ResearchTools #PeerReview #LLM #CitationAnalysis #ScholarlyComms

GitHub - gpowerf/citation-relevance-auditor: “You cited it, but does it fit?” — A prompt that systematically checks if in-text citations match their references in meaning and strength. Drop in a paper, specify the reference numbers, and get a clear, per-reference relevance verdict (Highly relevant, Somewhat relevant, or Not relevant) with reasoning.
“You cited it, but does it fit?” — A prompt that systematically checks if in-text citations match their references in meaning and strength. Drop in a paper, specify the reference numbers, and get a...