6 decades of complex text editing environments designed by programmers for programmers and yet no use found for any features besides tapping the arrow keys hundreds of times a second, reaching for the mouse, and waiting for the gaslighting machine to come change your diaper
the first AI bubble (1960-1990 roughly) was also full of grifters and run by the biggest assholes in computing at the time (they’d be beaten by remarkable recent innovations in assholes and grifting) but at least we got really good text editors out of the deal
the fuck does cursor even do. does it have a point other than shitting config files into repos? are there any good bits remaining in vscode or is it all just emacs as imagined by the JavaScript-brained rewritten for grift and exploitation reasons by a slopbot?

(This article has been translated into Spanish (PDF, with some additions) by Jorge Amado Soria Ramirez — thanks!) Preface I’m cranky. I complain about a lot of things. There’s a lot in the world of technology I don’t like, and that’s really to be expected—programming is a hilariously young discipline, and none of us
@moses_izumi @zzt I get the analogy, but I don't think it's particularly good.
The level of skill and knowledge involved in cooking adequately is far lower than that involved in developing a programme. I have done programming in the past - it saved my mortgage once. But I never particularly liked it. Much the same as cooking - I cook adequately because it's less horrible than eating out.
@zzt Honestly, aside from the bones being absolute shit, and microsoft fucking it up by being microsoft, vscode (pre-slop) is actually a pretty reasonable IDE design from 500 feet up if they didn't have a whole bunch of "oops you have malware now" footguns with the "extensions" system. (There are quite a few "extensions" that should be first-party modules, or be combined together as one extension. In what world would you want java support without a debugger?)
Splitting everything language-specific out into separate packages and "language servers" makes it a lot easier to avoid needing to reinvent the UI every time someone comes up with a new language or packaging system.
But being based on chrome of all fucking things? Yeah No. I've had so many performance issues relating to it being a "browser app" that it's genuinely surprising it's still "the best" free option...
(For my personal stuff, I prefer using gedit with a terminal, and just living without intellisense...)
@zzt sometimes I feel a bit behind, using a text editor written in 1980 that has not evolved much since then. Except that it works.
Probably should add UTF-8 support some day, though.
@zzt 80% of the time people describing what they have AI do just makes them sound like boomers that can't even open a pdf.
"I'm a coder... but cawanders and email are hawd..." /BabyVoice
@atax1a @mathew @FinFangFoomed @zzt today a customer criticized the documentation delivery of my colleague as "verbose and hard to follow when a simple annotated drawing could have been much better"
Guess how they did the doc
IT MADE ME SO HAPPY
People will literally boil the oceans to avoid learning awk.