@davidgerard "Faster." Some day we will realize, that it's not all about speed. At least that's what I hope.
The other day I've drilled a hole in a case to mount a switch and soldered it to some internal contacts. Maybe I'll stick to that when push comes to shove.
@cgudrian
In the past I had programmed on a piece of paper... Having a computer to do so was more comfortable, but I could surely say that developing "faster" never was my own desire, only those who paid me to do some of that.
I believe that this "we" isn't a coherent crowd.
@davidgerard this reminds me of gamers whining about a change to their favorite game while taking a five minute break between play sessions.
"Well I didn't actually stop but if I complain enough maybe they'll change it back."
I mean, it isn't wrong to complain about a game being made less fun. Just because it's still worth playing doesn't mean it's as good as it was before.
Not sure that applies to this situation, though.
Ah. Yeah, that's a thing I don't do. I have claimed games were unplayable before, but the last time I remember saying something like that, it was Skyrim soon after release, and a bug had indeed made it nearly impossible to play with my control setup. I only began playing the game once I found a guide to editing one of the game files to fix Bethesda's bug.
@davidgerard how can we be creative while knowing that enough random dice-rolling will eventually solve practical problems?
uh.... what does art have to do with practical tasks? why would that be in any way relevant?
@miss_rodent @davidgerard we think in terms of feelings, what the author is really saying is that they can't understand how anyone can want to code, in light of the text generator
and, well.... all we can do that is feel sad that they never learned to make art for their own sake rather than for the audience's?
@miss_rodent @ireneista @davidgerard
There's also the pervasive mythologising of the tortured artist that doesn't help.
If Mr Andersen doesn't want to write code by hand, then it seems to me that he's stuck writing code, considers an LLM to be a godsend in helping him do it with a minimum of struggle, and would rather be doing something else—making music, for example—but can't because it wouldn't pay his bills.
I hope one day there is a post-scarcity society in which people like him aren't forced by economic pressure to give up their talents and passions like this.
Sense of art, too. Some of us enjoy programming and would like to continue. Mr Andersen's parade may have been rained on, but he's been raining on *my* parade for the last several years.
Will I gloat now? No. First of all because my worries aren't over, and secondly because I'm not so heartless as to mock someone in what appears to be genuine despair. But I confess his lament brings me a smidgen of something vaguely resembling hope that my art isn't dead.
@nycki @ireneista @davidgerard @[email protected]
Who's gonna make the coffee?
In your home, the human-shaped robot you bought to replace that whiny staff that wanted to get paid and took sick days.
In the factories that prepare it? Also robots. Probably differently shaped.
Picking the berries? Day-laborers until the find a way to automate that.
They. Don't. Care. About anyone other than their elite friends* surviving.
*who would stab them in the back for another 5%.
it's really wild how quickly LLM use can foreclose the possibility of imagining doing things without relying on an LLM, for some people. LLM-as-panacea marketing, deskilling/cognitive offloading, precarious/exploitative employment exacerbating FOMO and imposter syndrome, prompting as gambling addiction, etc etc... any one element doesn't seem enough to inhibit people's ability to even imagine approaching problems on their own, but apparently the combo is really good at fucking people up in this way
@lina @davidgerard some of the worst, least productive coding experiences of our life have been when we were convinced we already knew what the problem was and just had to poke one small thing to make it work. we wound up trapped in a loop of constantly changing small things and not keeping good track of our hypotheses, and it went on for hours and hours until we woke the fuck up and started thinking.
of course, we did that WITHOUT the spam generator
@lina @davidgerard a significant portion of our earned wisdom is the ability to recognize when we're not thinking enough, and stop and re-orient
so it makes perfect sense to us that a machine that offers that death spiral as its ONLY mode of operation, would cause people to lose their core thinking skills
but why anyone would put up with it....... that, we will never get
You're so right. At work, company-wide, I still see more griping about GitHub Copilot token budgets than all other dev chatter put together. It's been three weeks since the tokens became metered and too many of my colleagues are still wondering how they can do their jobs now that the LLM won't write all the code for them.
@lina @ireneista @davidgerard I think it's important to remember that an LLM's *only* experience of the universe is interaction with human entities, first consuming massive volumes of undifferentiated human comms during initial training, then learning to produce what direct trainers want it to do during fine tuning.
It has absolutely NO direct experience of anything BUT trying to get humans to approve of its output. How could it be anything BUT manipulative on a VERY fundamental level?
@lina @ireneista @davidgerard @octothorpe I can’t help thinking about those students who in class would immediately follow the « turn to page 223 for the answer ».
Even when accompanied by an explanation, the lesson will not stick in your brain the same way it would if you’d done the work yourself and activated those neural pathways
It’s exactly the same at scale