@guffo @Gammitin @NanoRaptor No. It was an actual product, I remember it too.
I have a vague memory that the printer had a separate battery to the laptop, and this was called out in the reviews.
The one I lusted after was the Transnote. I also had the 701 'butterfly' which, unfortunately, was a miniaturisation too far. Yes, it looked cool as heck, but the X series successors were on balance much better.
an when running out of ink, just buy a new one
@Gammitin A BJC85 was a handy laptop accessory in 1998 or 1999.
NT 4.0 & Red Hat Linux.
Expensive to run!
I mean. They were B usiness M achines.
@Gammitin the standalone Canon BubbleJets were surprisingly accurate printers for 1988. I had one, it was a lot better looking than your typical Epson dot-matrix of that size at the time. Probably hard to find drivers and supplies now.
And cheap-ass lasers abound in 2026.
@Gammitin the standalone Canon BubbleJets were surprisingly accurate printers for 1988. I had one, it was a lot better looking than your typical Epson dot-matrix of that size at the time. Probably hard to find drivers and supplies now.
And cheap-ass lasers abound in 2026.
we had an original bubblejet and it wasn't much smaller than that computer so i'm really wondering how the computer bits and printer bits all fit together
the bubblejet was so magical after years of loud-ass dot matrix. just swish-swish.
also boy did they use the ink. that stuff would come out wet. if you used cheap paper it would ripple
I guess it wasn't the original at all. it was the BJ-10V.
this is pretty small for a printer even today. but as a i recall feeding paper into it kind of sucked.