DanJun 16
daniel:// stenberg://
curl.se now advertises HTTP/3 and HTTP/2 support in DNS so you should be able to read the curl documentation several milliseconds faster than before
Jun 16 at 8:23amWeb
Show threadBenjaminJun 16
@bagder What am I gonna do with all that saved time? 😱
Show threadauxyJun 16
@blindcoder @bagder travel the world.
Show threadan actual busJun 16
@blindcoder @bagder invent HTTP/4
Show threadAlexJun 16

@bagder When will curl make my disk faster?

$ time man -c curl > /dev/null
0m00.02s real 0m00.03s user 0m00.00s system

Show threadgittacaJun 16
@holsta @bagder It's already faster than "man" o.O
Show threadAlexJun 16

@gittaca Your man page takes 250ms to display?

Benchmark 1: man -c curl > /dev/null
Time (mean ± σ): 42.3 ms ± 1.3 ms [User: 35.5 ms, System: 6.8 ms]
Range (min … max): 40.3 ms … 45.7 ms 63 runs

Benchmark 2: curl https://curl.se/docs/manpage.html
Time (mean ± σ): 161.1 ms ± 12.1 ms [User: 30.4 ms, System: 21.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 128.5 ms … 183.8 ms 18 runs

Summary
man -c curl > /dev/null ran
3.80 ± 0.31 times faster than curl https://curl.se/docs/manpage.html

curl - How To Use

Show threadMax IndenJun 16

@bagder 🎉 more HTTPS RR. Thank you!

Small advocacy page I have built recently:

https://savearoundtrip.com/?d=curl.se#check

Show threadSexybiggetje🐖Jun 16
@mxinden cool, thanks!
Show threadvriesk (Jan Srz)Jun 16
@bagder worth noting is that it will also be faster to read it accross multiple parallell streams.
Show threadGrumpyDad 🇺🇦🇵🇸Jun 16
@bagder Well that'll give me heaps of time over for other stuff!
Show threadFuchsiii~~~Jun 16
@bagder @catsalad uwu
Show threadJean-Baptiste "JBQ" QuéruJun 16
@bagder at a previous job, where the company had set a 2-second performance target for a specific scenario, I insisted that we use 2000ms instead, because every millisecond counts.
Show threadMTRNordJun 16
@bagder Thanks to the messages in IRC I also now noticed my pages announced it but I forgot the firewall /o\ Thanks for nudging me into debugging my h3 as well :D More h3 for the world :D
Show threadMathias HasselmannJun 16
@bagder As a proven HTTP expert: What's actually your professional opinion regarding HTTP/2 and HTTP/3? Are they really worth it? Are they a valuable contribution to the Open Web, or are they rather attempts to lock-down the web, by making its protocols more complicated, more obscure, less accessible to the general public?
Show threaddaniel:// stenberg://Jun 16
@taschenorakel HTTP/1 is quite ineffective to deliver a modern website over so yes, I believe creating h2 made a lot of sense. If h3 makes sense compared to h2 is basically a matter of what is important to you.