@glyph That is not what the word means to me.
To me it means my own sovereignty, personal, individual over my hard and software. My own self. Autonomy. And the same for every other individual.
And that's how and why I am going to continue to use it. I will not surrender that word to anyone. Kind of the point of it.
@glyph I'm respectfully asking you to add that meaning to your... brain space?
I hate being the ackshully guy, please try to see the situational comedy over the cringy nature of doing it, but it's actually in the dictionary:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sovereignty
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sovereign
It's a pretty important concept to me, that's why I am pushing back on this so much.
I am looking at it holistically.
Do you think the fact that nation states happen to reuse the same concept, taints it and that taint implying some necessity for self censorship to prevent association?
It's very funny that we're arguing over a word meaning "being free of external influence", you insisting I shouldn't use it btw. 😂
Yes and I was letting you know that that usage is not unusual, it's the reason so many use it in the current context and discussion of adopting more FOSS.
It's not a sub community. As I said, my usage is literally in the dictionary.
No hard feelings to you either though. I respect that you read the word that way, it's just not going to make me stop using it my way.
@glyph @bmaxv this is outdated, it doesn't cover his protégés joining the Brexit Party (now Reform) then going into the House of Lords and Boris Johnson's administration, and it also doesn't cover Furedi running an institute funded by Orban, but it covers everything up until those points pretty well.
https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v32/n13/jenny-turner/who-are-they