@simsaens @stroughtonsmith Can you define “social content”?
Seems like Netflix doesn’t count. Nor Spotify. Does YouTube? It wouldn’t for me.
@taylorhadden @simsaens from the UK government statement, "This would capture user-to-user platforms, whose purpose is to enable social interaction and which allow users to post material, alongside algorithms.", and "harmful functions such as livestreaming and stranger communication with children for under-16s"
We're not here to litigate the definition. It's already happening
@stroughtonsmith @simsaens Sure, it's happening in one place, but that doesn't mean it's the best version of the thing. The idea of a law is open to litigation.
A sideways angle at this thing (that does not really apply, but for illustration): what about platforms with two distinct kinds of "users"? Uber or Lyft have riders and drivers. Both are "users", but they are not the same kind. (1/2)