pride month is coming up soon, so i want to make something very clear, especially for the younger queers and others who might not know the history.

in nearly all of america in the 50s-60s, being gay was considered both a mental illness and a crime punishable by prison time (up to and including a life sentence) and/or "experimental" psychiatric torture (electroshock therapy, lobotomies, and worse). you could lose your job for being suspected of homosexual behavior with no proof, and the fbi and post office spied on you if they knew you were queer. most gay bars were mafia-owned because no one else had the money or inclination to pay off the crooked police.

with that in mind: "stonewall," the event that we commemorate with pride parades today, was a violent riot incited by a police raid on a gay bar in manhattan. the fierce activism that has given us the basic personhood we enjoy today was built on a foundation of desperate physical struggle against unfair policing and stigma, the stakes of which were prison, death, or worse. gays, lesbians, trans folks and drag queens, dancers, kinksters, drinkers and teetotalers, all of them stuck together because nobody else had their backs. we can march peacefully today only because we had to fight for our lives before.

my point is this: there was no room in those days for means-testing who was a Real Respectable Gay, and there's no room for it now either, especially as our rights are eroding again. we have to stick together with people we think are gross but who haven't actually hurt anybody, because the same weapons you use to oust those you don't like will be turned on you in a heartbeat.

now more than ever, don't be a fucking cop.

@typhlosion "my point is this: there was no room in those days for means-testing who was a Real Respectable Gay,"

But it's not like that stopped them trying. Plenty of "respectable" white cis queers didn't want to be grouped with the rest of us at the time

@Dangerous_beans @typhlosion Like someone using the term "transvestite"?
@janethemotherfucker @Dangerous_beans that's not the right term to use when discussing gender as we in the modern day conceive of it, but it's a term that was used both in and out of queer communities at the time of stonewall (the late 1960s), which is the context in which i used it. someone who identified that way at the time might consider themself trans today, or they might just call themself a drag queen or a crossdresser, or something else entirely; it's not something you can easily replace with modern parlance when discussing queer history
@typhlosion @Dangerous_beans if it were me discussing it, I'd replace that word with all the missing terms it replaced. Trans people did exist as trans people back then. Christine Jorgensen existed.
@janethemotherfucker @Dangerous_beans that's true and fair and i'll admit my misstep there. i'm sorry.
@typhlosion @Dangerous_beans  ❤️  🏳️‍⚧️ 
@janethemotherfucker @Dangerous_beans i remembered i could edit the post so i changed it. i guess originally i picked the word out of a desire to preserve some of the historical texture of what it was like to be queer at that time, since that's what the post is about, but its not really important enough to keep