Second desk-rejection for my I-Field Theory manuscript from Foundations of Physics (same editor), again without technical feedback or peer review.

Rejections without reasons prevent productive dialogue and make it impossible to address concerns I don't know about.

The paper remains on Zenodo for anyone who wants to engage with the physics: https://zenodo.org/records/20390108

#Physics #TheoreticalPhysics #SpringerNature #OpenScience #AcademicPublishing #Entropy #FoundationsOfPhysics

The Irreversibility Field (I-Field):A Classical Framework for Fundamental Irreversibility in Physics

 We present the I-field: a classical scalar field minimally coupled to matter whose equation of motion contains an explicit time-asymmetric dissipation term, derived from the Euler-Lagrange-Rayleigh (ELR) formalism [@rayleigh1877]. The field does not modify the gravitational sector: Einstein's field equations are unchanged, and the total stress-energy tensor of matter plus I-field is covariantly conserved. In the limit $\gamma \to 0$ the theory reduces exactly to standard classical field theory.  The dissipation term $\gamma u^\mu \partial_\mu \mathcal{I}$, where $u^\mu$ is the four-velocity of the cosmological rest frame and $\gamma > 0$ is a coupling constant, is odd under time reversal while every term derived from a Lagrangian is even. This explicit breaking of time-reversal symmetry at the level of the field equation --- rather than through boundary conditions or statistical postulates --- has three consequences derived as theorems within the framework:   1. The I-field carries a covariant entropy production density   $\sigma_{\mathcal{I}} = \gamma\dot{\mathcal{I}}^2 \geq 0$   pointwise, establishing the second law of thermodynamics as   a field-theoretic identity rather than a postulate.     2. The energy transferred from matter to the I-field is strictly   non-negative, providing a microscopic account of dissipation   without invoking a heat bath or environment.     3. The preferred time direction is globally well-defined,   identified with the cosmological rest frame in which the   cosmic microwave background is isotropic [@fixsen2009].     The theory is self-contained and makes no modifications to the gravitational sector. The framework provides a minimal, classical extension of standard field theory in which irreversibility is fundamental rather than

Zenodo
@FundamentalTime For most publications in peer-reviewed journals, a paper should somehow fit into the field. Research is usually a slow process and any new publication makes small steps forward, building on previous research. Peer-reviewing has to be done by the same people, who have to do their own research to publish. So there is not much time for evaluation and feedback is often spared for work that has a good chance of publication. It may also take several tries, at different journals.
@FundamentalTime Especially if your work contains radical new ideas, you may want to think about: Is there some available literature on the same idea? Is the work consistent with know facts? Are all uncommon phrases and terms properly defined, so that these are understandable to the audience of the journal? What does this work contribute to the research field? Is it actually the right journal for this?