LittleAlex 🇺🇦🇮🇱🇩🇪🇳🇴
John Tinker@littlealex
True, the AI does not understand human experience. However, it know nearly everything that has ever been said about the human experience. The AI brings a chorus of echos of real authors.
StrypeyThe net contains ...
@johntinker
> nearly everything that has ever been said about the human experience
Does this mean the net knows things? See;
DB 🌱💦 (@[email protected])
Attached: 1 video Imagine if someone photocopied every book in the public library, burned the library down, and then opened a subscription service for the copies. That's the AI business model. And here's how they're pitching their slop to us. Sam Altman: “We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity or water, and people buy it from us on a metre." #AI #SamAltman #AIslop #TechBrosAreInsane
@johntinker
> Does a book know things?
No. The person who wrote the book might know things, and someone who studied the book diligently and/or has a particularly good memory might end up knowing some of them too. Otherwise there wouldn't be much point in books.
But to say that a book can "know" requires a definition of that word so expansive that it becomes meaningless.
Does a plant know it contains genes? Does a machine know about the serial numbers stamped on it?
I am trying to point out that things that do not "know things" can still be useful tools for learning things.
@johntinker
> things that do not "know things" can still be useful tools for learning things
Sometimes. Certainly in the case of the net and books. I wouldn't try to learning anything from a Trained #MOLE though. That would be about as useful as going to a library where instead of reading a books, you open a stack of them to random pages, and read a word from one book, then from another, and so on.