when a bunch of independent researchers, well known software authors and others all say the same thing:
"the mythos paper was largely marketing fluff"
and none of them collaborated
i think the writing is on the wall .
back in sept, i caught claude talking itself into lying to me. Months later, @jonny discovered in the claude code leak that its hardcoded to lie.
then all the mythos hype
its like stan from monkey island is in charge
https://sites.google.com/view/llmwritingdistortion/home
https://semgrep.dev/blog/2026/malicious-dependency-in-pytorch-lightning-used-for-ai-training/
https://www.thatprivacyguy.com/blog/anthropic-spyware/
https://aisle.com/blog/ai-cybersecurity-after-mythos-the-jagged-frontier
https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2026/02/03/open-source-security-in-spite-of-ai/
theres a few choice picks from my stash of articles
@jonny like basically everyone who hasnt drank the kool-aid who is, with their own hands, testing all thes claims is like
"what the actual fuck how is any of this real? it barely works a tenth of the time and when it does work its like, junior analyst mode. how is china supposedly getting away with murder while the rest of us have to deal with this hallucination and refusal bullshit?"
Viss
jonny (nonvenomous)