Paco Hope6d ago

@km As far as I can tell:

  • No one who has worked with raw Mythos output has ever written about it.
  • No one who has written about it has ever used it.

They would much rather have @bagder writing about it because his opinion carries weight. That means he can’t have direct access. To give him access, they’d demand to gag him with an NDA, like everyone else who has access.

This technique of making readers mentally fill in the gaps between what is verifiable and what is claimed is genius marketing and really dishonest. But we have come to expect systematic and casual dishonesty from these companies.

Show threadadvokatt
@paco @bagder yeah, let me clarify: i talked with people who not themselves used mythos, but whose org was given access, so yeah, they just told something which they were told
May 11 at 11:54amWeb
Show threadPaco Hope6d ago

@km Yeah. I didn’t mean it personally. I wasn’t criticising what you said, I’m sorry if I sounded that way.

I was just pointing out this constant theme. The only thing that ever is made public is the fully-polished, human-vetted final result. They carefully hide all other details and the press don’t care.

@bagder