Whoa, when did they switch to 1024x1024 icons?
For years and years, I had a Palm OS screenshot inside of a Mac SE screenshot inside of a Windows 95 screenshot, just to see the progress.
*makes 1024x1024 vector image*
@glennseto @evert @thomasareed
Probably vector in the original design, but everything was still bitmap-slinging last I checked.
The only OS that used true, pure vectors for everything was IRIX, AFAIK.
@glennseto @evert @rl_dane @thomasareed Mac OS X initially used PDF for a lot of icons, because its imaging layer came from NeXTSTEP, which was based on PDF. (Which in turn was because Steve didn't want to pay royalties to Adobe for Display PostScript.)
For example, /System/Library/CoreServices/Dock.app/Contents/Resources used to have the PDFs for the dock's icons, like `poof.pdf` for the cloud animation when you dragged something out of the dock. There are still quite a few PDFs for UI elements under /System, but the number has been going down as successive redesigns have taken place.
@mathew @glennseto @evert @thomasareed
I had no idea! Well, I only used OSX from 10.5-13, so I probably missed some important bits.
I remember this from when those new icon sixes were announced. And I remember when those Macs had such as impressively crisp and clear screens. (After, say, an Apple ][e, the pixels were basically invisible.)
I'm…really not sure why they don't just use SVG for icons at this point.
Earlier versions of Mac OS X had beautiful photorealistic icons that would have been difficult to make in SVG, but this is not that. This could be vectorized easily.