@Infrogmation Often the ad links are how the people who made the content you're looking at get paid. Knock yourself out when it's giant media conglomerates, but smaller content creators are a different story.

@jack @Infrogmation

It's ok. I just won't read their content. Therefore I have no moral obligatin to them. I'm fine with that.

@jack Smaller content creators, I throw them a couple bucks on Patreon and keep blocking the ads. They often have no control over what the ads are, so the ads are still usually scams regardless of conglomerate or smol bean.
@jack @Infrogmation pretty much every good and ethical ad gets around all blocking methods.
@jack @Infrogmation it's not that simple. Usually when someone puts and ad link, they don't put an *ad* link they put an adservice link. Adblockers block adservices over which anyway the creators don't have control. And they may show nasty stuff (think of google ads) good faith ads always get through adblockers because most of them are hardcoded into the website so it is permanent ad put there by the creator. It is noninvasive, compared tp google ads.

So no, by using an adblocker you don't block revenue for small creators. This and the fact that patreon kofi liberapay exist

@jack

Even then, the content creator is asking me to disable my Pi-Hole for everyone and every device in the house. I'm not going to do that.

#AdBlockingIsInfosec

@Infrogmation

@jack @Infrogmation The Web is a pull medium. Websites are merely guest in our browsers. We decide what content is shown.