I don't trust Nate B Jones at all. This guy has a podcast about AI for CS people and I think it's propaganda designed to bring the doubters back. All of his podcasts lead with validating some problem we've all noticed with the way AI has been implemented, but then it pivots to "but it's not really as bad as you think."

This gives the illusion of balanced reasoning. Considering both sides.

But the real reason I don't trust this guy is he put up a graph like this:

@futurebird That's my worst graph of 2026 so far. I wonder if anyone can top it.

@david_megginson

"I wonder if anyone can top it."

shhhhh. please. please don't speak these things into being.

@futurebird @david_megginson Have this, quickly! 😄

@agturcz @david_megginson

but this is a *good* graph

@futurebird @david_megginson I hope so. I've provided it as an antidote. I'm glad it works 😊
@futurebird @david_megginson Very glad to see you’re less lethal than pancreatic cancer, at least in Australia!
@emjonaitis @david_megginson @futurebird they fortunately have corrected that graph by now, it seems?
@T_X @david_megginson @futurebird Oh, thanks for pointing that out! I had remembered when this post went around and hadn’t revisited the source.