I've just published my April story for @forbes. It's all about non-exhaust emissions and covers lots of recent research into their extent in our cities and their impact on our health
I've just published my April story for @forbes. It's all about non-exhaust emissions and covers lots of recent research into their extent in our cities and their impact on our health
@LaurieWinkless
Good read, thank you.
Has anyone tried up quantify the amount buses and cyclists contribute compared to cars? And I'm presuming the things cyclists can do to reduce that are largely the same as for drivers- tire pressure and riding style, except that often people are replacing car trips with cycles so unless it can be realistically replaced with walking instead cycle trips are net benefit.
@LaurieWinkless this gives a surprisingly (to me) small difference between car and bike as they mention 3.6 vs 11 g/100 km; though maybe mountain bike emissions would be much larger than road bike... if the latter is closer to the 1.43 g/100 km that is mentioned for later stages in mountain bikes (or even lower) then it'd be a bit more significant.
Anyway, I expected the speed and mass difference to lead to more significant differences.
the metal wheels on various types of rail also wear out, so those particles have to be going somewhere.
But those would be metal, not plastic, so I've been wondering what the health impacts from rail wheels might be like.
The most interesting part to me:
"At an individual level, car owners could drastically reduce non-exhaust emissions simply by driving better – avoiding rapid acceleration and hard cornering, anticipating stops and using gentle braking to slow down. Maintenance too makes a difference, so be sure to keep tires at the appropriate pressure, and don’t carry heavy objects unnecessarily."