Why do they want non-hybrid KEMs and signatures, anyway? Seems like a bad idea to protect all of everything with nothing but unproven crypto.
@argv_minus_one I have an introductory chart https://blog.cr.yp.to/20260221-structure.html showing the arguments and counterarguments.
Most common argument from proponents: NSA is asking for non-hybrids, ergo support non-hybrids. This argument works for (1) companies chasing NSA money, (2) companies that take any excuse for extra options as a barrier to entry for competitors, and (3) people who think that "NSA Cybersecurity" isn't a conduit for https://www.eff.org/files/2014/04/09/20130905-guard-sigint_enabling.pdf but rather an independent pro-security agency.
@rsalz DJB sees a conspiracy where one may not exist ... but has a history of seeing one where it did very much in fact exist.
I think cryptographers erring on the side of extreme caution is a net benefit (and his points about unjustified and unexplained foot-dragging and resistance on Classic McEliece adoption have been well documented)
DJB has always been touchy and can really get into the weeds on some conspiracy theory. really smart guy but i tend to take his rants with a heavy grain of salt.
it's been this way since early usenet days.