No one will read this, but I wanted to express my thoughts about @arcanechat.
I'm really disappointed: they're making fun of Session shutting down, claiming it's not really decentralized. The thing is, ArcaneChat is decentralized too, but not in the same way. If their server goes down, all users from their instance won't be able to chat again until it's back up.
(1/2)
Session uses a network with many nodes. For it to go completely down, all of the nodes must be down at the same time.
If a new user discovers ArcaneChat through these posts, I don't think they'll have a good first impression.
One last thing: you're saying Session got millions of dollars but can't survive—but you also asked for donations in one of your posts.
I find that behaviour extremely hypocritical, completely irresponsible, and unprofessional.
(2/2)
@buage buddy you are a bit out of the loop, ArcaneChat can use several relays at the same time, if arcanechat.me goes down it doesn't matter much, your other relays/nodes will keep working, it is also super easy to migrate from one relay to another
about asking for donations, that has nothing to do with the fact that session is burning thousands per month in server costs while chatmail relays are super cheap to run
Buage
ArcaneChat
gdmc