Why don't I care about the Artemis mission/program?

By all rights, this should be something I am deeply passionate about. I’ve been in tech/engineering my entire adult life and was obsessed with NASA as a kid. I even live on the east coast of Florida and can sometimes see the launches/landings over the ocean. But I just… don’t care at all. I’m not suffering from depression or any other malaise, and generally things are fine. But I haven’t clicked on a single link or looked at a single image. I know this has not been the case for many, many people, so I’m wondering what might be different about this launch (or really the whole program in general), and curious if anyone else has found themselves feeling the same.

I love space and discovery. I also dont super care about this because what is even the point of it? We did a fly around of a rock in our backyard we know super well already. Give me more JWST, not this
Yeah I’ve been thinking maybe this is it – it’s still technically impressive and I have nothing but admiration for the teams who have pored their sweat and tears into making sure it’s safe and reliable, but it’s kind of a ‘so what?’ moment.
Telescopes and geology have always been the cool part of space, not that humans are in it.
If they landed and did stuff that was more complex than we can send robots to do it would have been pretty awesome!

This flyby is a necessary precursor to landing and doing those cool things.

They need to take tiny incremental steps because the cost of a fuckup is so great.

If the public has to watch someone expire in space due to a malfunction the existing candle flame of support for these endeavours would be snuffed out.

With only two seconds of ping they can work from Earth with robots. Sending people is just a dick contest.
Yeah, but the point is to test the technology which will eventually get people back onto the moon, set up permanent off-Earth habitation, etc. Which in turn will/could be part of future steps for further-reaching exploration. I still think it has value as a building block.
But we already had the technology to get to the moon, take pictures, and get off it. Nothing against the crew, im glad they got this once in a life experience, but theres nothing new to this.
We had it, yes, but we lost it - I believe that many of the technical plans from Apollo have been lost over the years, so some of this is pretty much reinventing the wheel to get us back to where we were before.

What part of reinventing the wheel is slashing NASA’s budget to shreds? This is just the last public test flight before space is walled off as a playground for the rich. They’ll get their tourist flights and luxury colonies and nice vacations from the boiling toxic hell they turned earth into.

If you think any resources are going to trickle down to us earth peasants, I’ve got a moon base to sell you.

Not so much lost but, its an entirely new tech stack. So any solutions we might have had in the past are no longer appropriate solutions.

Thats a weird take.

Literally everything that just went to the moon and back is “new”.

Yes, we have been to the moon before but that doesn’t mean that all the cool stuff we just did is not an amazing achievement.

what is even the point of it?

No one’s been on this spacecraft design while it’s in space before, and it’s got some kinks that need to be worked out (like the issues with the toilet); it’s a shakedown flight to figure out what goes wrong when people are actually on board. That’s not really all that sexy compared to a moon landing, but testing your support systems in practice really needs to happen before you do more ambitious things with the craft.

Yep, I am definitely more excited by space science news. I’d say I’m just more mature now and interested in more grounded “pure” science, but it wasn’t too long ago that I was giggling like an idiot as we watched the 2 falcon heavy boosters landing back on their dual pads at KSC, so I don’t think it’s entirely just a loss of child-like wonder (though it’s wearing thin these days, gotta admit).
It’s impressive in the sense that it’s the second time they launched a mostly clean sheet heavy-lift rocket. It took spaceX dozens of exploding rockets before they could even think about putting humans on one. Just getting something that insanely complex working the first time is kind of incredible, and I say this as an engineer who works on much simpler things that almost never work perfectly the first time.
It’s been overshadowed by other current events. Quite a shame, really
Epstein files ?

That goddamn scandal. The persecution of minorities and the warmongering. The socio-political climate now is far worse compared to the Apollo missions then conducted at the time the US government was unpopular mainly because of the Vietnam War.

The arguments against Artemis aren’t surprising as these also mirror the skepticism towards the Apollo program.

They aren’t doing anything new, we have already been around the moon.
We can’t even wipe our own asses without jihading or reinstating a cool new kind of slavery with extra steps. What are we going to do with a new frontier?
I’m betting a corporate slavery jihad of environmental degradation.
I mean, that tracks historically
The Expanse sheds one I believe to be a plausible picture of our future, although it seems optimistic on some fronts.

I disagree.

Its slightly firmer science than star trek, but it still makes a lot of license IMO.

I dont think the cost of sending humans to Mars or to do asteroid mining will ever be justified. Bots, and not humanoid ones will explore the frontier of space, and collect the minerals we need.

If you think about all the stuff humans need to survive for any length of time it just doesn’t make any sense to send a human.

For me it’s the pace. I know it’s not that simple, but we’ve been to the moon already. The first unmanned Artemis mission was almost 4 years ago, and now this one, and the next one - which will include landing on the moon…again…won’t be for another 2 years at least. We won’t even begin to build a base until the 2030s.

Even the moon base is just a “stepping stone” to Mars, and we already know that long-term colonization on Mars is unrealistic, given current tech. We don’t yet know how to even survive on Mars (or the moon, for that matter) for more than a few days.

And even if we solve these problems…then what? We also know that even if we figure out how to keep a few people alive for just a few years on Mars, there’s just no reason to try to keep a large number of people on Mars. It’s just too damn hostile.

I don’t know. I agree that this doesn’t have the same romantic feeling of awe and discovery and exploration that I feel like I’m “supposed to” have.

I remember when I was in China, didn’t even have internet.

My parents bought me a children’s book about planets and stuff… I still remember it called 十万个为什么 (Literally: 100 Thousand Whys)

I was so intrigued.

I remember I had not much things to read and I kept reading that over and over again. I remember still having it when I was in 2nd grade in the US… like that’s my last “artifact” of my pre-US life…

I remember just putting it in my bookbag and bringing it to school cuz… idk why… maybe I just felt nostalgic about it and thought it’d be cool to bring a book nobody else in the school would be able to read… sort of like a special ancient text made for me xD

Sadly the binding on that book is garbage and it fell apart and I no longer have that book…

(I don’t remember NASA being mentioned btw)

Later I remember constantly googling space stuff once we had internet access at home…

I think its:

  • Childhood… like space is a big concept… so it feels like this “big thing” and I get obsessed about it… like many kids probably do. You go from being in a tiny apartment at home to suddenly knowing about very big empty space… Mind Blowing…

  • Humanity already been on the moon… meh… not that exciting… especially not after a few decades and interests fade… like omg someone sailed across the ocean… boo boring… already done…

  • I’m finding it hard to be happy about any of the positives coming from the US government these days. A couple of bright spots don’t really outshine the depressing everything else.
    The “positives” don’t usually translate to any sort of benefit for the average person. Yes, I am aware that there are exceptions to this.
    Spaceflight creates jobs.
    Jobs that keep supporting and propping up the system we live in.
    It also wasnt even really a bright spot because it was being actively used as a propaganda story for Trump.

    I feel the same apathetic “whatever” response. I love rockets. I love space. I struggle to care about this.

    The program is almost 2 decades late and using recycled technology. It is literally using spare parts from the shuttle. I don’t believe it will ever actually get to the boots on the ground phase. I am actually surprised they made it to this mission. After all the boondoggle from Boeing I really thought it would die a quiet death somewhere out of sight.

    Not only do they have technical hurdles, we have seen normally safe agencies become political battle grounds. We see science becoming less and less important at every level of society. We are living through Idiocracy and they still act like we are the same country that went to the moon the last time.

    If we see people on the moon in our lifetime I don’t believe they will arrive on a NASA mission.

    Same. Part of it for me, I think, is that is an enormous expenditure that goes mostly to Elmo. The Apollo missions were more in-house, with lots of cool innovations, and it feels like the privatization of a great and inspiring heritage.

    While I share some, if not most, of your disinterest, it’s probably worth pointing out that while “we” had a Saturn V rocket system and Apollo space program that did, at least superficially the same as Artemis so far, we could not actually repeat a Saturn V launch today, as-in we lost many of those skills and associated experience.

    In many ways, Artemis is essentially getting back to where we left off in 1973 with the intention of eclipsing it, but the ongoing NASA budget cuts being perpetrated by the current regime are in my opinion going to curtail the program before too long.

    If I recall correctly, after Apollo 11, the TV audiences dwindled for the rest of the program, with a brief spike for Apollo 13, so perhaps there’s an aspect of that to consider.

    For me the disappointment was triggered by the poor camera handling during launch, the view of backpacks, food and plushies surrounding CAPCOM at Mission Control, the broken toilet debacle and the heat shield obfuscation, all of which made this less leading edge science and more of a shitshow.

    I hope the astronauts land safety in a couple of hours, but I won’t be watching for days like I did for the first Shuttle launch in 1981.

    this song describes perfectly why I couldn’t give a fuck about space colonization anymore.

    after covid, Ukraine, Palestine, Iran, Sudan, etc. and the sheer number of genocides the governments around the globe managed to squeeze in in just a short 6 year period, I stopped caring about the progress and democracy fetish they’re trying to force feed us.

    if we wanna make the world a better place, we gotta stop relying on them. i know now they’re gonna use those space launches to perfect their genocidal weapons, that’s why I could enjoy NASA before I knew the military industrial complex

    Gil Scott-Heron - Whitey On the Moon (Official Audio)

    YouTube
    I thought that before i read your post.
    It’s hard to be excited about going to space when you can’t afford to exist on earth.
    I find it pointless. We need to think about real sustainable progress in space but you just have to look at the earth to see how we are about sustainability. I firmly believe we have to work on sourcing space resources from space and that is what we should be most workin on. I mean if you look at it reusable rockets are the most impactful thing to happen to our space endeavours in this millenium and it was due to doing one thing. Being more sustainable.

    There’s a certain strain of thought that runs through my mind sometimes, that space is just too big and too empty to really be worth going into. Like the moon and Mars, maybe a couple other in-system planets, are the only things close enough for realistic human trips in lifetimes. And the trips so far have shown us that yes, those are just big balls of monotonous dirt. You ever kinda landed in that state of mind?

    In spite of all that, I do still get excited about it, and really enjoyed following Artemis. Excited to see us (maybe, hopefully) land on the moon again soon. It’s remarkable that humans are able to rise to that challenge, and I hope we don’t ever entirely stop.

    I recalled back about a couple years ago about how we were going back to the moon.

    And even then I was like “…Why?” When, we already have had a good idea about it all this time from the Apollo missions and all the stuff we sent up to it over the years.

    It was exciting for us back then to go to the moon because:

    • It had never been done before.

    • It was literally a Space Race.

    So those two alone got everyone invested and excited. Nowadays? What are we gaining from this? I don’t think anything.

    Do you feel science and tech is becoming tainted? Its no longer exciting. Its becoming a bane of existence. I don’t think its a direct link, but its a tenuous link.

    A step forward for ma…whilst back here they are killing many many man. It leaves a sour taste.

    It doesn’t help that a lot of people in power seem to take issue with objective realities.

    It boils down to this: Going to the moon in the 60’s was political, though a massive technical feat.

    Since then we’ve figured out how to send robots to fucking Mars to do the science we want to do, for a fraction of the cost (and none of the risk) of sending humans.

    Artemis just isn’t where we should be spending money, never mind the political bullshit surrounding it, and the typical government vendors getting their hands in the cookie jar like they did for Apollo (looking at you, Boeing).

    And I say all this as someone fascinated by Apollo, and as excited as anyone else by the prospect of humans on the moon. I just no longer see the cost/benefit of humans vs automation there.

    We have remote rovers in the sea and on Mars. For the moon surely we could send all sorts of devices to do science there. It’s faster to reach, we have near real-time comms, it has a greater solar exposure so power is less of a problem. So where are those rovers?

    We don’t have them because they would expose the pointlessness of sending humans.

    Artemis just isn’t where we should be spending money

    The warcry of a capitalist. It’s the justification for ending park services, museums, or anything that isn’t specifically generating a porfit.

    Eh, yes you’re right but seriously what are we gaining from this mission? As far as I’ve heard there’s nothing really new that were gaining from it, just… Because?

    To the ops point, there are a multitude of more beneficial projects that money could have gone toward instead in the same realm.

    Well, I guess that depends on what you define as an achievement.

    In terms of skills and expertise there’s only a handful living people with lunar experience and all of them are 60+ years old. It’s important to pass these skills down from person to person as training manuals and videos aren’t the same as an actual person passing on this wisdom. This one shouldn’t really need any explanation.

    For dick-measuring newspaper headlines, we did just send some humans farther into space than we ever have before. That’s a tangible thing that’s measurable; anyone can understand it.

    For raw, practical science, somone who’s a bigger nerd than me will have to tag in for that. What I do know and understand is we’re launching more advanced technology with a ship that’s both smaller in size with more interior space. We’ve got measurements of the astronauts in deep space and data on the far side of the moon. Regular people arguing over the importance of this data isn’t going to produce anything conclusive.

    What are you blathering about?
    You are too focused on the dollar amount.

    Funny that you feel this way, because I thought about posting a similar and yet almost opposite post to [email protected]. I think it gets too much attention compared to other missions.

    I think the Artemis mission isn’t completely useless and even regardless of Lunar economy and nostalgic motivation, there are some benefits, sure. But all of this over-sensationalized exposure with more emphasis on the USA is the reality check that we’re slowly resetting to a space race. I always thought that it was a beautiful story that what started as competition turned into the biggest evidence of our united efforts. And while I don’t think collaborations will end, I fear that they will turn into alliances and we are back to competition.

    Mildly Infuriating - Lemmy.World

    Home to all things “Mildly Infuriating” Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] [https://lemmy.world/c/actually_infuriating] I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I’m not about stealing content! It’s just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime. _________________________ Rules: ::: spoiler 1. Be Respectful ___ Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion. Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here. … ::: _________________________ ::: spoiler 2. No Illegal Content ___ Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required. That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals -No CSA content or Revenge Porn -No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing) … ::: _________________________ ::: spoiler 3. No Spam ___ Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules. -If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community. -Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community. -No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers -No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community. … ::: _________________________ ::: spoiler 4. No Porn/Explicit Content ___ -Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content. -Do not post Gore or Shock Content. … ::: _________________________ ::: spoiler 5. No Enciting Harassment, Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts ___ -Do not Brigade other Communities -No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy. -No Witch Hunts against users/communities. -No content that harasses members within or outside of the community. … ::: _________________________ ::: spoiler 6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags. ___ -Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags. -Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags. … ::: _________________________ ::: spoiler 7. Content should match the theme of this community. ___ -Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating [https://lemmy.world/c/actually_infuriating] put it there. -The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that’s where you should post the big stuff. … ::: _________________________ ::: spoiler 8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC. ___ -Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient. … ::: … _________________________ Also check out: Partnered Communities: 1.Lemmy Review [/c/[email protected]] 2.Lemmy Be Wholesome [/c/[email protected]] 3.Lemmy Shitpost [/c/[email protected]] 4.No Stupid Questions [/c/[email protected]] 5.You Should Know [/c/[email protected]] 6.Credible Defense [/c/[email protected]] _________________________ Reach out to LillianVS [/u/[email protected]] for inclusion on the sidebar. All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

    I cared a little bit. Then the astronauts started blathering about the bible.
    I feel happy for everyone taking joy in this moment. I don’t feel much of anything for it though. It’s wildly neutral.

    Because you can see it for the distraction that it is. In a vacuum it is a wonderful or at least interesting and significant thing but it is also clear that it’s just a PR stunt by the US government.

    That’s not to belittle the training, dedication, preparation, and everything else that was done by all of the people around adjacent to or even inside the rocket. The indictment is not on them.

    In all honesty at this stage it’s not that exciting. They’re hyping up people going further from the earth than ever before, which is technically true, but astronauts have orbited the moon before just not quite as far in absolute distance.

    So this is mostly doing something done before in the 70s. Rocket launches, grainy images of the moon from close up, photos of earth from near the moon and astronauts floating in zero G isn’t new.

    I don’t blame you for not getting excited to watch long videos where not a lot happens very slowly, or reading press coverage which is brutally honest largely fluff.

    The ultimate goal is exciting, but that doesn’t mean every step on the way is exciting. I suspect the first moon landing will be of more interest, then the next one will not be, even though the landings are a stepping stone to Mars.

    This ^ I get it, the images we are getting back ARE stunning, but is there anything about this mission that demanded a manned spaceflight? Couldn’t we/didn’t we already do the same thing remotely with the other planets?

    I’m glad we’re getting back to it, and I’m happy to see anything other “We’re sending mice up on the space shuttle… AGAIN!”

    But even Artemis IV where they are planning a moon landing has been done.

    Let me know when the first colony is formed, then I can get excited.

    Let me know when the first colony is formed, then I can get excited.

    It will only be open to billionaires. Or to people there to make money for billionaires. That’s why I’m not excited.

    Compulsory moon colony for billionaires would be great thanks.

    is there anything about this mission that demanded a manned spaceflight?

    Yes, a lot actually.

    You don’t just send astronauts into space for a photo op. You pair the photo op with critical testing of systems required to support the next iterations of the mission.

    Artemis II Science - NASA

    Artemis II science operations will lay the foundation for safe and efficient human exploration of the Moon and Mars, from human health to geology.

    NASA

    I don’t care because I got disillusioned with technology in general in recent years.

    For some reason I always thought progress is objectively, exclusively positive. Now I know it depends on who wields it, just like it is with everything else in the world.

    Don’t know why it took me this long to notice.

    Btw the prospect of one day seeing man made lights on the moon has become revolting to me.

    Gil Scott-Heron Whitey on the moon.avi

    YouTube

    for me, it’s the fact that it’s being used as a political tool by the usa to broadcast their prowess, that it’s being presented as a hopeful look in the future all the while the country running this is bombing and murdering hundreds of thousands, and that the companies benefitting from artemis’s publicity are mostly “defense” contractors like spacex and lockheed-martin, aka again the same people doing all the genocide

    it’s hard to feel excited about it even tho there is plenty of cool science being done, that cool science stands on a mountain of tragedy and horrors