FSL and BSL belong on any list of false-promise licenses:

They are not open source. They are restrictive source-available licenses dressed up with “open” language.

Reading the code is not enough. If users cannot freely run, use, or build on the software because of field-of-use or competition restrictions, the software is not open source.

Marketing it as “open source” or even putting “open” in your name is misleading twice: first in the license, then in the messaging.

#opensource #fauxopensource #license

FSL

The Functional Source License (FSL) is a source-available license that converts to Apache 2.0 or MIT after two years.

@adulau

> FSL provides everything a developer needs to use and learn from your software without harmful free-riding.

We have a license for that at home in the form of agpl