
Attached: 1 image some asshole doing free marketing for anthropic decided my post was worth screenshotting as an example of what’s wrong with the AI critics but they utterly failed to engage with any of the points I made, as if pushing back on this obvious shit at all is the problem anyway here’s a citation for the Firefox thing because no that wasn’t just me talking, the grift really is that fucking obvious
@zzt Thanks, and where is that post/paper with section 3.3.3 shown?
@adamshostack no clue but here’s an anthropic blog post that says exactly the same: https://red.anthropic.com/2026/exploit/
> Specifically, Claude needed to exploit a stripped-down version of the js shell (a standalone utility that lets developers use Firefox’s JavaScript engine without the browser) that resembles an unsandboxed content process in the browser, and a task verifier to determine whether the exploit worked.

Attached: 1 image Claude Mythos: the AI hacking model too good to release! Allegedly Your expensive static checker https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-c1DC-gNizQ&list=UU9rJrMVgcXTfa8xuMnbhAEA - video https://pivottoai.libsyn.com/20260409-claude-mythos-the-ai-hacking-model-too-good-to-release-allegedly - podcast time: 7 min 07 sec
