AI Company Clones Musician’s Voice, Then Copyright-Strikes Her Own Songs

Folk musician Murphy Campbell found herself at the center of a major ordeal when an entity called Timeless Sounds IR uploaded AI-generated imitations of her music to every major music platform, then used her recordings to strip her of her own income. According to sources, the scheme worked like this: someone fed YouTube videos of ... Read more

Rude Vulture

Dan Dennett warned us about this kind of thing in 2022.

https://berryvilleiml.com/2026/04/09/deep-fake-debacle/

Deep Fake Debacle | BIML

Apparently, AI was used to steal original art from an aspiring musician. This is something that eminent philosopher Dan

Berryville Institute of Machine Learning
@cigitalgem i hate this god damn timeline.
@neurovagrant #AI has its cake and eats it too.
@cigitalgem @pluralistic This is something we're hoping to fix with the Good Potato Project! Spoke to a bunch of labels at the Big Ears festival, they liked the idea. More info: goodpotatoproject.com (literally filming more explanation videos this week, adding to the demo, etc)
@cigitalgem when laws no longer serve the public good, it is in the public interest to violate the law.
@cigitalgem this isn't just an AI issue. YouTube allows anyone to file a copyright strike by claiming to own the rights, and leaves it up to the creator to defend. I know of creators who have been forced off for clear fair use content because they can't afford to fight it, and YouTube's response is a digital shrug. Copyright law applied this way is not protecting copyright holders, it's protecting thieves. AI just automates the theft.
@dresstokilt @cigitalgem We need anti-SLAPP for copyright and DMCA strikes.
The Koch Network Is Pushing Trump to Accelerate AI, Documents Show

Right-wing political group Americans for Prosperity, backed by oil and gas billionaire Charles Koch, sees data centers as part of a larger pro-fossil fuel agenda.

DeSmog
@cigitalgem "YouTube’s dispute process places enormous trust in whoever files the claim, with little built-in protection for independent artists who lack legal resources." - this is true but that's also because that's what the law incentivizes. There are serious consequences for failing to comply with takedown requests, and effectively no consequences for filing them fraudulently. YouTube certainly could do a better job, but we need to change the law.