Ich bin nicht deiner Meinung. Es gibt da offensichtlich ein unüberwindbares Problem zwischen dem OpenSource Gedanken und der kommerziellen Ausrichtung.
Das kann man beurteilen wie man will, aber offensichtlich können die Differenzen hier nicht überwunden werden.
Dann ist es besser, dass jeder seinen Weg geht.
Persönlich glaub ich, dass es dem Projekt nicht schaden wird.
https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2026/04/05/lets-put-an-end-to-the-speculation/
Ideally, we would have preferred to avoid this post. However, the articles and comments published in response to Collabora’s and Michael Meeks’ biased posts compel us to provide this background information on the events that led to the current situation. Unfortunately, we have to start from the very beginning, but we’ll try to keep it brief. The launch of the LibreOffice project and The Document Foundation was handled with great enthusiasm by the founding group. They were driven by a noble goal, but also by a bit of healthy recklessness. After all, it was impossible to imagine what would happen after September 28, 2010, the date of the announcement. At the time, nobody could imagine that the companies that had supported OpenOffice.org until then would create a project to kill LibreOffice. Also, if the project were to be successful, it would require resources greater than those available, and above all, a deep management experience. Fortunately, the project grew quite rapidly. However, the founders’ different backgrounds and opinions were at the same time the reason for some bold decisions – many of which right – as well as a few mistakes, which are the root cause of some of the current
kid37
Andreas Zieritz