This is absolutely beautiful and very well done.
> Nothing you own is finished. Everything exists in a state of permanent incompletion, permanently needing.
This is absolutely beautiful and very well done.
> Nothing you own is finished. Everything exists in a state of permanent incompletion, permanently needing.
Did you even bother to read the thing? It's not about the watch.
@mischa Yes, I read it. It seems to romanticize old tech, like the pictured watch, as some pinacle of design because it was simpler in some ways.
It was simpler because it was constrained by what was possible at the time.
If your criticism is of surveillance or rentier capitalism, that is something I agree with, though Apple may not be the best example.
RE: https://front-end.social/@stefan/116345248295405561
Exactly why my watches tell time. ok, I have one also tells temperature and compass direction. And why my favorite watch is my 1915 one: it just ticks and tells me the time, all in exchange for a wind every other day :-)
And honestly, compared to a real, nice watch, a smartwatch looks shite. (As does the F-91.)
Anyway, we have that choice. Either you want an attention-grabbing do-it-all device on your wrist, or you don't. If you don’t, there are better-looking choices available than the F-91, and ones that don't require you to correct the time, or exchange a battery. (3/3)
@stefan