RT: @implausibleblog Left: Ed Miliband says more drilling will not cut energy bills

Right: Ed Miliband approves license for more drilling

@ZackPolanski

#milliband has turned into #billiemad
Trying to beat #trump in the effort to destroy our environment?

#idiots #ukgovernment #starmer are all mad

@ZackPolanski Renewables will though, which is why big oil and energy companies don't want it.
@ZackPolanski It's almost as if he's full of shit...
@ZackPolanski But… but… the Tories spaffed 90% of our reserves in the mad dash to cut taxes for political gain in the eighties. You don’t ’just drill a hole’… the drilling derrick has to be positioned, then you drill for ages, then you cap the new well whilst you move in a production platform and connect a pipe to the network that heads for shore. It’s an awful lot of time for politicians with a sight horizon of weeks. Then it’s sold on the market and you have to buy it at going rate.

@christineburns Amongst the many #BigLies that dominate #UKpol, the lie of Tory economic competence is one of the biggest. They thew away the #NorthSea oil/gas bonanza, asset-stripped the public sector, created a huge infrastructure backlog, and destroyed swathes of communities.

None of it was caused by honest misjudgement or by unforeseen circumstances. It was all known and planned.

It's a crime as devastating as treason, committed publicly. Yet its barely acknowledged. 😡

@ZackPolanski

@2legged @christineburns @ZackPolanski okay, sure, but not relevant to the topic at hand?

@fishidwardrobe I think rhat the history of bad policy on oil is v relevant.

@christineburns @ZackPolanski

@2legged @christineburns @ZackPolanski but the tories have nothing to do with this, do they?

@fishidwardrobe the Tories are HM Opposition, and have been yelling for drilling

@christineburns @ZackPolanski

@2legged @christineburns @ZackPolanski and? so?
it just looks to me as if Labour have made a dreadful decision, and you're blaming the tories for it.
if you meant something more nuanced, okay. but that's not how it looks.

@fishidwardrobe That's a v crude and simplistic imterpretation.

My point here is that Labour is making another bad decision, partly under Tory pressure, adding to a history of bad decisions.

I noted a history of disastrous Tory policy on North Sea oil and gas. With more than 500 chars I would also have noted Labour's huge failures. If you want to treat these short observations as a full statement on a topic, we're not going to get along.

@christineburns @ZackPolanski

@2legged @christineburns @ZackPolanski if i thought it was a full statement on the topic i would have just blocked you. i've already said that perhaps you meant something more nuanced but didn't manage to communicate it.

when i had just that one toot, i could only go on that one toot. it didn't mention any of the stuff you've said subsequently.

@fishidwardrobe I don't see any point in continuing to engage with your strange games. #Bye!

@christineburns @ZackPolanski

@ZackPolanski

I get that politicians may have to change their mind when circumstances change.

So I propose a law that they have to demonstrate to an open, independent tribunal that the change made a material difference to their logic.

Failure to do so would lead to a fine or resignation, depending on the seriousness.

As it is, flip-flops have a major impact on our faith in politicians and representative democracy in general