Actually, I have some questions about #AudioBooks

You can't say you've read the book, but having read a book is a common phrase that people understand. 'I've read that book.'

While 'I've listened to that on audio book' is accurate, it doesn't have the conciseness of 'I've read that book'.

Do you think there needs to be a new phrase to describe the act of listening to an audio book?

Like: 'I've audio-read that book.' or 'I've audioed that book'.

Audio-read sounds OK, I think.

#AudioRead #Reading #Books

@lydiaconwell When two people travel by car to A, we say they drove to A. We don't get caught up in the fact the one person technically held the wheel while the other was passenger. We say they drove. They both went through the motion, were in the vehicle, travelled from A to B through driving.
That's how I consider reading. Sometimes I read a physical book and travel through the pages by myself. Sometimes I benefit from a narrator as I travel that book. In both cases I say I read the book.

@lastrobot I'd feel like I was deceiving a little if I said I read a book when I'd listened to it being read.

But I could tell people I devoured the book. Or ingested it. That could work.

@lydiaconwell How curious. You clearly are not technically devouring the book. Is that not also deceiving? Or do some words get a pass?
@lastrobot Well, I think if the metaphor is more clear, people would be less fooled.
@lydiaconwell I don't think I really get why the concept of 'fooling' is so present and important in this. Is there some big 'fooling people about reading' thing going on? I'm at a loss why such considerations are material.
For me I like talking to people about books they've read, no matter how they read them. I expect someday I won't be able to read physical books myself. It would sadden me to think that folks would judge me a liar if I used the word 'read' for audiobooks.