
To defend her false flag theory Hend Amry is now posting a graphic about random Jews around the world lying. In the top left is a really far out claim that Elie Wiesel wasn’t actually a holocaust survivor. Bottom right is just racist caricature drawings. She’s going deep into antisemitism.
@YKantRachelRead @vicfroh @gwynnion And yet, the shoe fits perfectly. Being Jewish doesn’t make an Israeli good any more than being Christian made Germans good. The converse is also true.
If you don’t want to be a monster, don’t do the things the monsters do.
If you simply want to pretend not to be a monster while freely doing those things, don’t be surprised if your dishonesty gets called out.
@YKantRachelRead @vicfroh @gwynnion
And that's why independently verifying claims on the internet is so important. Here is the NY Times story covering it
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/01/world/middleeast/lebanon-shiite-israel-evacuation.html
The NY Times does seem to confirm that forced expulsions from Southern Lebanon will include a religious element.
@YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion
The message did not claim that it was the Jews' army. It said it is an army consisting of Jewish people, committing an ethnic cleansing.
The point was that the command not to hide Jewish people in people's attics is the same as what Germans gave in 1939 and 1940. It was not acceptable back then and it is not acceptable today.
And you are trying to defend a genocide.
@YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion
And yeah, of course publishing a post by a proactive antisemite is not okay.
But you trying to complete skip the content by diverting the conversation to whether one person who also has a certain view is antisemite or not does tell a lot about you.
If you had been around back then, you would have helped the officials find Anne Frank much sooner than she was found.
@alteNBnordpfalz @YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion
Supremacism is what religions cause. A lot of supremacists have turned that way because of religion.
Christians in Germany were committing genocide for supremacist reasons.
@alteNBnordpfalz @YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion
Now you're basically implying that all Jews are supporting the horrors Israel is doing. That does not seem to make much sense, so there is probably some communications mismatch.
You wrote "the Christians" while I meant "Christians". There's at least one of the misunderstandings, but there are probably more. Nazis' actions were not done by the Christians, but they were absolutely done by Christians.
@Tuuktuuk @YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion Where did I wrote "the Christians"? Also you are twisting my words. I said that saying "Jewish troops" instead of "Israeli troops" lumps all Jews together with the IDF and is therefore antisemitic rhetoric. What is so hard to understand about that?
@alteNBnordpfalz @YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion @ose_rouge
> Where did I wrote "the Christians"?
Here:
https://pfalz.social/@alteNBnordpfalz/116345022321452840
@alteNBnordpfalz @YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion @ose_rouge
The target of the cleansing is a religious group. The command is to not hide any Muslims when the troops come collecting them.
Religion is a factor on this attack, very clearly.
@alteNBnordpfalz @YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion @ose_rouge
I did not read the text as saying "a raiding troop representing Jews", but "a raiding troop consisting of Jews."
Them being Jews is important and must be mentioned, because they definitely should understand why ethnic cleansing is not okay.
What wording would you have preferred for expressing that?
("Jews killing Muslims" does not mean the same as "the Jews killing Muslims.")
@Tuuktuuk @YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion The original post said "Jewish troops" not "Israeli troops" or "Zionist troops" there is a big difference. Saying "Jewish troops" has an antisemitic intent.
Also there is a sizeable amount of Druze in the IDF.
@alteNBnordpfalz @YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion
Yes, because it's relevant here. Just like it was relevant that the nazi soldiers in 1932-1945 were Christian troops.
The point is, especially with what Jewish people had to suffer in 1930's and 1940's, they have no excuse of "we didn't know". The troops' behaviour is a slap in the face for those who had to endure ghettos, concentration camps, death camps and pogroms.
are there enough people alive today, who've had proper history lessons at school - especially European history? It's like a copy 'n paste. Instead of population and voting registers they use AI, just missing a few details still, to make the picture complete.
Lebanon is, by Mid-Eastern standard very liberal, and you define Hezbollah as "a Muslim living in Lebanon", so let's say... Maybe about hundred thousand?
Why are you asking?
And also, you forgot to answer the question.
This is a conversation about the Israeli military saying that no Muslims, including 2-year-olds, may be hidden by Christians from the Israeli military. You are defending an ethnic cleansing.
@Tuuktuuk @vicfroh
If Lebanon could govern itself and not have people shelling Israel, then this wouldn't be a problem.
Do you need a geography lesson? Jordan shares the largest border with Israel. And yet they aren't fighting each other. Egypt isn't fearing an incursion and they share a border with Israel.
Lebanon has to manage it's border and STOP THE SHELLING. Since the government hasn't been able to do that, the war has started. And yes, children will be hurt. Because of Hezbollah.
Not all Muslims are Hezbollah members. Especially the children are not.
You are trying to divert the conversation to one subgroup of the people the Israeli army said they are attacking.
I am not a fan of Hezbollah or Hamas or other bunches of militants. You are wasting your time trying to convince me to stop being something I already am not.
Plus, you're a genocidal maniac. Which is not okay.