Victator
Ms. Rachel Andry (Isn't Real)@vicfroh FYI, Hend Amry has expressed virulently antisemitic views in the past, including spreading false-flag conspiracy theories about attacks on Jews, doubling down on a Holocaust-denier conspiracy theory (the idea that Elie Weisel wasn't a Holocaust victim) and sharing fascist antisemitic caricature art. source: https://bsky.app/profile/wafflecut.bsky.social/post/3mhtzonl4vk2g
Waffle 🧇 (@wafflecut.bsky.social)
To defend her false flag theory Hend Amry is now posting a graphic about random Jews around the world lying. In the top left is a really far out claim that Elie Wiesel wasn’t actually a holocaust survivor. Bottom right is just racist caricature drawings. She’s going deep into antisemitism.
RantingCanuck@YKantRachelRead @vicfroh @gwynnion
And that's why independently verifying claims on the internet is so important. Here is the NY Times story covering it
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/01/world/middleeast/lebanon-shiite-israel-evacuation.html
The NY Times does seem to confirm that forced expulsions from Southern Lebanon will include a religious element.
@RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion I'm not questioning the accuracy of the story. I'm suggesting that Hend is engaging in yet another antisemitic trope (conflating the Israeli military with Jews as a whole) in a long history of antisemitism, and that we shouldn't be sharing her posts as a result.
Tuukka R@YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion
The message did not claim that it was the Jews' army. It said it is an army consisting of Jewish people, committing an ethnic cleansing.
The point was that the command not to hide Jewish people in people's attics is the same as what Germans gave in 1939 and 1940. It was not acceptable back then and it is not acceptable today.
And you are trying to defend a genocide.
@YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion
And yeah, of course publishing a post by a proactive antisemite is not okay.
But you trying to complete skip the content by diverting the conversation to whether one person who also has a certain view is antisemite or not does tell a lot about you.
If you had been around back then, you would have helped the officials find Anne Frank much sooner than she was found.
Linkszentriker Cris@Tuuktuuk @YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion No they wouldn't. They'd be criticizing that someone said "Christian" instead of "Nazi" as if Christians were perpetuating genocide for religious reasons instead of ethnic nationalists doing genocide for supremacist reasons.
@alteNBnordpfalz @YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion
Supremacism is what religions cause. A lot of supremacists have turned that way because of religion.
Christians in Germany were committing genocide for supremacist reasons.
@Tuuktuuk @YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion It wasn't based on Christianity but based on Nazi ideology though. And the evangelical/protestant Church as well as Jehovah's Witnesses in Germany opposed the nazis while the catholics supported them. So I wouldn't say it was Christians, because a lot of Christians opposed the Nazis. Doubling down and saying it was the Christians is just bad faith.
@alteNBnordpfalz @YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion
Now you're basically implying that all Jews are supporting the horrors Israel is doing. That does not seem to make much sense, so there is probably some communications mismatch.
You wrote "the Christians" while I meant "Christians". There's at least one of the misunderstandings, but there are probably more. Nazis' actions were not done by the Christians, but they were absolutely done by Christians.
@Tuuktuuk @YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion Where did I wrote "the Christians"? Also you are twisting my words. I said that saying "Jewish troops" instead of "Israeli troops" lumps all Jews together with the IDF and is therefore antisemitic rhetoric. What is so hard to understand about that?
@alteNBnordpfalz @YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion @ose_rouge
> Where did I wrote "the Christians"?
Here:
https://pfalz.social/@alteNBnordpfalz/116345022321452840
@Tuuktuuk @YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion @ose_rouge Reread my comment and then reread your comment and you took "the Christians" out of context and acted like I wrote it in the sentences where I only wrote "Christians".
@alteNBnordpfalz @YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion @ose_rouge
The target of the cleansing is a religious group. The command is to not hide any Muslims when the troops come collecting them.
Religion is a factor on this attack, very clearly.
@alteNBnordpfalz @YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion @ose_rouge
I did not read the text as saying "a raiding troop representing Jews", but "a raiding troop consisting of Jews."
Them being Jews is important and must be mentioned, because they definitely should understand why ethnic cleansing is not okay.
What wording would you have preferred for expressing that?
("Jews killing Muslims" does not mean the same as "the Jews killing Muslims.")
@Tuuktuuk @YKantRachelRead @RantingCanuck @vicfroh @gwynnion @ose_rouge I am done with you constantly trying to defend antisemitic rhetorics by twisting semantics.