Doesn't CC BY NC SA provide the same protections as GPL 3 minus the wanenty stuff? #creativecommons #SoftwareLaw
@cutesobri "Protections" for whom? It doesn't protect the creator, because no license protects the grantor. And non-commercial licenses don't really protect the recipient, because "commercial" still apparently means whatever the grantor decides at a particular moment. And no Creative Commons license has a source requirement, so it definitely doesn't protect later recipients from ill-advised formats that they can't access...
@jcolag I'm just looking for a license that make it, so people can't use my shit for making money im 50% sure gpl3 doesn't do that right?

@cutesobri I mean, no, because the entire point of GPL-like licenses are to enable people.

I'm not remotely interested in telling you what to do, here, but I will say that I don't see the value of a public license if you have strong opinions on who can use your work and how. A non-commercial clause in particular seems like it'll push out people worried about using your thing in an office, but not corporations happy to adapt "Hollywood accounting" to Free Software.