CM-003 Wintegrity  

successful spacecraft have to be either named something really cool and mythological, or something incredibly autistic like the Modular Orbital Populsion and Habitation Apparatus Block 2a

if you try to name it something like starship or starliner it is doomed from the start

Apr 2 at 6:54pmWeb
Show threadCM-003 Wintegrity  4d ago
you can just tell, “this was named by a room full of absolute nerds” or “this was named by marketing executives paid NASA’s annual budget per week”
Show threadStephanie 🎀4d ago
@winter just checked on the Artemis hashtag- it seems they’re entering the phase of lunar flight you named your instance after 🌒
Show threadCM-003 Wintegrity  4d ago
@BeamsAndBows still hours away from the burn but so excited
Show threadΨ*Ψ4d ago
@winter TBH they would do better paying the nerds! NASA has some killer backronym game
Show threadCM-003 Wintegrity  3d ago
@psistarpsiii wordplay really should be financially rewarded
Show threadLanda 1d ago

@winter
So my planned

Manned
European
Distributively
Unified
Service
Annex

For the ISS (or whatever space station is still in orbit when it’s done) is twice as safe? 😁

Show threadCM-003 Wintegrity  1d ago
@Landa as long as nobody makes eye contact with it
Show threadLanda 6h ago

@winter that made me dream that looking up into the sky wasn't safe anymore because of a Blofeld Expy villain putting Medusa's head on a pedestal in the middle of Tycho crater.

Admittedly, I can only blame myself for that.

Show threadCM-003 Wintegrity  6h ago
@Landa it would be a tragic loss but we could always deorbit the LRO to destroy it
Show threadLanda 5h ago
@winter Thanks, I'l make a note of that for my subconscious :D