EN/FR
| follow Ætherglow | @aetherglow |
| website | https://translunar.academy |
| xmpp | [email protected] |
| donations <3 | https://liberapay.com/changeling |
| donations 2 | https://ko-fi.com/translunar |
| alt | @[email protected] |
| follow Ætherglow | @aetherglow |
| website | https://translunar.academy |
| xmpp | [email protected] |
| donations <3 | https://liberapay.com/changeling |
| donations 2 | https://ko-fi.com/translunar |
| alt | @[email protected] |

I'm seeing openness to age verification laws within some left of center organizing spaces 😱
Folks, we gotta talk to our people to kill this harmful policy. Regulate dangerous big tech practices, not people!
LGBTQ+ kids in hostile environments suffer when they can't access community online.
Age verification also facilitates excluding representation of marginalized folks. Also, it is at odds with the right to repair — shouldn't we own our devices, and not the other way around?
Nyapollo

Nyartemis


just spent three hours trying to figure out the answer to "what are the legal repercussions if I go topless outside"
the legislative and case law on this matter are exciting in that there's no definition of "female" at the State level, so what is a "female breast" isn't defined. so, this leaves us with the Federal "definition" (which implies I do not have female breasts) and the City definition (which implies I do have female breasts)
nevermind the part in Massachusetts General Law where all persons (mostly) have the right to do anything a white male person can do
I spent three hours digging through this shit. best as I can tell, as long as I don't alarm or shock anyone, it's not lewd and/or lascivious to show off some titty outside
also not indecent exposure unless I whip my dick out
--
join me in my effort to take back topless equality advocacy from the Raëlians
Poll for guys!
Would you spend a bunch of time and effort and money to have someone cut off your balls? There's no cancer, they feel fine, nothing wrong with them, other than you have them.
NASA in 2028 following another budget cut when the regime loses interest in spaceflight again and abruptly cancels Artemis IV
“in fact we lied, there are no Mars payloads on the SR-1 Freedom. we are doing the Asteroid Redirect Mission whether you like it or not. the spacecraft is now fully autonomous and its comms systems have been disabled. the new target is Earth. deliver ten SLS and Orion to KSC before 2030 and we will save your precious planet.”
shouldn't the much smaller commercial satellite have to be the one to stay out of inhabited space stations' way?