Humans are a fundamentally social species.

Generative “AI” is a fundamentally anti-social technology, as its whole purpose is to abstract social relations away.

It is therefore an anti-human technology.

@aesthr I would say that social media, like Mastodon is also an anti-social technology. As it adds deeply crude simplifications of human interactions, which don't exist in that form outside of the Internet and computers in general.

You can't block people that easily and perfectly in the real world for example. It's even to some degree a sign of a functioning democracy that you can't and you have to interact with people outside of your own echo-chambers.

Let's not fool ourselves, AI is just another anti-social technology and deeply against being human, but there is an existing growing list of such technologies, which people accept and do nothing against it.

@phantasus
Nowhere to the extent of AI. Atleast in Mastodon you talk to real people
@aesthr

@unclesimon @aesthr Are people in their own bubbles, talking with each other in their own bubbles, "real people"? I dispute that believe.

It's just an absurd comically simplification of what normal human interaction is in the real world, built by people who built these platforms out of their own cynicism when it comes to human interaction.

@aesthr counterintuitively (and I may be 100% wrong about this) I think what made it so utterly popular is giving people artificial connections in times when real connections are diminishing
@aesthr [raises hand for nuanced disagreement]
@aesthr respectfully, genAI absolutely isn't great, but your argument isn't either

@aesthr I promise I am not.a mindless tech booster. But I have noticed the same effect with any information artifact. We use them to replace human interaction with mechanically scaled messaging.

A formative experience for me: in an earlier phase of the internet, I dramatically reduced the flow of new people to the physical meetings of our university’s computer club – by documenting some things too well.

@aesthr

It is just a tool, tools are non-human

@aesthr Great way to put this!

I've said in the past that people who see this technology as empowering and argue that without it they wouldn't be able to finish a project that requires drawing or writing well, or writing code: why not ask a friend for help?

Ah, they're all busy toiling under capitalism? Well there's your problem.

@aesthr "I asked ChatGPT."

Did you try asking a librarian? There's often literally a chat widget on your library's website!

@aesthr you seem to have collected a number of commenters that understand neither gen ai nor your point
@mensrea @aesthr This seems to be one of the biggest issues I've seen in social interactions. In both face-to-face and online.
@mensrea This happens most of the time I post about anything here

@mensrea @aesthr Oh I understand her point alright

.

..

...

....

Oh sorry you were waiting for a "but"? No.... no no.... no "but". I agree.

@aesthr 1000%. Thank you for articulating this. ⭐️

@aesthr Generative AI is nothing more than the sum of all the content collected across the internet over the past 30 years. And if you feel offended and think you had nothing to do with it, you’re wrong - you did, and you still do.

If you feel betrayed by the platforms you used and trusted because they sold your content and you never got your cut, then you should admit they were never planning to serve you for free forever or pay you for your passion - this is still capitalism.

@aesthr I've been talking about this in the context of author spaces. People feeling so lonely and disconnected from other writers that they brainstorm with a bot. Pages like Facebook killed the forums and now people mostly connect via discord servers you need an invite to access (so you need to know people to get to know people). It's a mess and hard to counter as one individual.