underrated life hack: if you read the manpages they tell you how things work
(except when they don't. oops. well at least there's... reading kernel sources...)
@astrid Ah yes. Back when computing was a somewhat academic discipline, and not "vibe" based.
@astrid And then when reading the source you go like "Oh… oh no *writes some code*"
@astrid do they even make comprehensive manuals like that for most gui stuff?

im just so fed up i need to go look up videos online for how to use anything on my computer...
@mar depends on the software but sometimes you have that corporate behemoth gui that has that ginormous f1 menu

@mar @astrid tbh one of the best things of working with big corporate software like ArcGis was for me always the documentation. Translated in several languages little pictures (also localized).

It still crashed all the time. But the gui docs were nice :3

@astrid attention span too shot to read docs sorry 
@epsi ikr 😭 and a lot of it could also be written in ancient latin
@epsi there's a reason why tldr exists smh

@astrid You don't need a man to mansplain anymore. There are manpages for that. We really are living in the future.

Just like a man, the manpages often explain everything except my original queestion.

@astrid except on gnu . then tje manpage is like a lil teaser of the info page . spoilers : the info page sucks
@fiore @astrid Info is also shittier tech than manpages, they are stored in plaintext by default so can't be reexported or rendered on non monospace or a different column size, unless you find the actual source files which arent installed and dont work with the shitty reader and use their antichrist Perl toolchain to comoile them to a pdf or smth.

Meanwhile just man -Tpgf and be happy
@[email protected] tbh I love reading good docs
@rachel I AM ALWAYS SAYING THIS
@rachel @astrid As one who writes the manuals, this warms my heart.
@rachel @astrid seems like too much of an accurate picture of my gf to be coincidence. uncanny.
@astrid plot twist: you don't have man installed because you girl
@astrid I often start my answers to questions about software with: "Is looking it up in the manual considered cheating? The manual says that...".
@astrid That's why it's called mansplaining, isn't it?
@astrid Unless it those annoying "info" pages that hide the information that should be in the man page.

@astrid

"""
The full documentat for <what you wanted to look up> is maintained as a Texinfo manual. If the info program is properly installed at your site, the command

info <what you wanted to look up>

should give you access to the complete manual.
"""

@oblomov @astrid Oh god, texinfo. Alongside kpathsea and autoconf, things I remember making working life a trivial bit more irritating and miserable.

@chiffchaff @oblomov @astrid

If you haven't encountered it yet, info(1) detects if output isn't a terminal, giving the entire document in one go, so you can make it MUCH more usable with

$ info $THING | less

to just get a dump of the whole info-page without having to navigate in and out of various sections.

@gumnos @chiffchaff @astrid that's actually good to know, thanks.

@oblomov

I've found that I can't tolerate using info(1) without that trick, so I tend to share it around in the hopes that others experience similar relief 😆

@astrid Correction, they tell you how the things are SUPPOSED to work. It's when you discover how it works that you make merge-requests to fix the man page 😇
@astrid This is somebodies 100page linkedin post
@astrid Sidenote: I really wish manpages consistently included example commands
@astrid What?? I don't trust a man, when catpages?
@astrid Whats ur favorite manpage?
Mine is 'hier'. Thats how i show new folks the beauty of documentation and order.
@pitch mine is https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/execve.2.html because it's actually slightly wrong
execve(2) - Linux manual page