If you're unsure how rare LLM plagiarism is or isn't for 💻 programming code, watch this clip! ⚠️

Full source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvuiSgXfqc4 (Not legal advice, watch yourself and draw your own conclusions.) #llmslop #antislop #antiai #noai #stopai #llm #llms #ai #generativeAI #opensource

Help me boost this post if you're curious what the Linux foundation thinks: https://hachyderm.io/@ell1e/116285351290767548

@ell1e I'm pretty sure I got from this post to this article, but I can't reconstruct the URL chain. Regardless, this looks relevant: https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-subprime-ai-crisis-is-here/
The Subprime AI Crisis Is Here

Hi! If you like this piece and want to support my independent reporting and analysis, why not subscribe to my premium newsletter? It’s $70 a year, or $7 a month, and in return you get a weekly newsletter that’s usually anywhere from 5,000 to 18,000 words,

Ed Zitron's Where's Your Ed At
@ell1e Lossy compression, at a high enough quality level, is not very lossy.

@ell1e what dissapoints me most is the fact that the exact same issues with slopilot were found already in 2021 (the infamous fast inverse square root algorithm, ref: https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/74137/who-owns-the-right-to-the-code-generated-by-github-copilot), and people just chose to ignore that. Slopilot could have stopped embarrassing itself in those 4.5 years.

Apparently, instead they declared Q_rsqrt a bad word instead: https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ph6irk/githib_copilot_put_q_rsqrt_on_the_indecent_words/

(I mean, that is a win for us who don't like AI, but I'm losing faith in this discipline…)

Who owns the right to the code generated by GitHub Copilot?

This question was somewhat inspired by this Meta SO question I found this other question... but that is more general. When someone uses GitHub Copilot does the person that is using the tool own the

Law Stack Exchange