[1/4] I enjoyed reading your feedback on the importance of the 'Following you' indicator on profiles.
@stefan @monikavernandes @harvestntech @katherine_montalto @richlv
@iwein @fembot @cobalt123 @mtechman @f @ddlyh @nathandyer @iwritelike (and there are probably others I've missed here, forgive me)

#FeedbackFriday

[2/4] What stood out to me most is the weight this indicator has on making many of you feel safe in the Fediverse. Time can pass, we forget why we followed people, and sometimes things even go wrong.

@stefan @monikavernandes @harvestntech @katherine_montalto @richlv @iwein @fembot @cobalt123 @mtechman @f @ddlyh @nathandyer @iwritelike

[3/4] Even after following someone, knowing that account follows you adds a layer of confidence and helps you to make decisions large and small – whether you're pruning your following list, or choosing how to engage with a questionable mention.

@stefan @monikavernandes @harvestntech @katherine_montalto @richlv @iwein @fembot @cobalt123 @mtechman @f @ddlyh @nathandyer @iwritelike

[4/4] I'm confident we can reintroduce the 'Follows you' indicator before 4.6, and your feedback also has me curious about a few other areas this badge could be more directly helpful – in your "People I'm following" list, for instance. Rest assured, you've been heard! And thanks again for your collaboration.

@stefan @monikavernandes @harvestntech @katherine_montalto @richlv @iwein @fembot @cobalt123 @mtechman @f @ddlyh @nathandyer @iwritelike

One hurdle here is localization & excessive character counts. How necessary is the explicit text 'You follow each other' – would it be sufficient to show 'Follows you' in all cases, including when you're following the person back? This considerably simplifies things and expands where we're able to display the badge.

@stefan @monikavernandes @harvestntech @katherine_montalto @richlv @iwein @fembot @cobalt123 @mtechman @f @ddlyh @nathandyer @iwritelike

@imanijoy thanks for asking! I guess yes, "Follows you" is fine and anyone can understand. Something like "Mutuals" would maybe be confusing...
@harvestntech thank you! And yes, we're deliberately trying to avoid the ambiguous 'Mutuals'