Have you created an extra Fediverse account just to get access to additional content?
Have you created an extra Fediverse account just to get access to additional content?
Thanks everyone who replied.
I've mostly been thinking of this in terms of tags.pub. I've spoken to a number of people who had accounts on personal Fediverse servers or small sites, who also got accounts on mastodon.social so they could follow the hashtags there. I know other people do the same for search.
There are other examples in replies: using the Threadiverse for a different social structure, using Mobilizon for a different kind of data.
@evan Yeah, everyone should just feel comfortable skipping. Some I don't get, some I don't feel qualified to answer, and so on.
For this one I assumed you meant things like Pixelfed and Loops. I did see that thread you posted about tags.pub and didn't actually understand what it was. I figured I'd get it eventually as you wrote about it more :)
@evan Back to tags.pub. If I follow a popular hashtag like #emacs where 5,000 people spread across 10 instances post with the emacs hashtag, I see all posts from any instance I am currently linked to but miss any folk on (small, personal) instances I may be unaware of.
However, for the tags.pub emacs stream to match (or surpass) following hash tag it would need all 5,000 emacs minded folk to consciously sign up for tags.pub. Is that correct ?
Not trolling, just trying to understand fully.
@promovicz we're working on it!
This is so cool and I really appreciate the effort your group has put into it.
I notice the current draft formalizes an admin role with membership control. Has the task force considered whether the specification should also accommodate or remain compatible with consensus-based governance models? Many communities desire democratic control over membership decisions and I'm wondering if the spec could be designed to support multiple governance patterns rather than privileging a single authoritarian hierarchical one.
@evan not for extra content, but to have some separation of content.
That being said, I can see how someone who's first / main fediverse profile is on some focused server like Bookwyrm may create a Sharkey profile to have access to microblogging Notes or something
@rwg Anyway, I'm not sure I understand your question. It's surprising to me that you're not familiar with the term "content" or "Web content". I think you might be trying to make a subtle distinction that's lost on me.
Regardless, yes, I was specifically asking about joining a service to see more/different notes, articles, videos, audio, images, and other stuff, and different ways of collecting and filtering them.
An example might be creating a mastodon.social account to follow a hashtag.
@evan Let's ses: Mastodon, Loops, a couple Peertube accounts, several that got added automatically with that Wordperfect plugin (and since removed?), and there's probably a few I'm forgetting.
I would love to collapse the waveforms and consolidate these "me"s in the 'verse
@evan I created a Pixelfed account because I can’t use my kolektiva one there. That’s one of the main broken promises I’ve seen in the fediverse that I hope one day will be fixed.
My dad joined the fediverse yesterday by creating an account on mastodon.social, and when I told him about “imagine being able to log in to Instagram with you Twitter account” I had to be careful and say “although that’s still work in progress”.
This was one of my main selling points to join the fediverse, although I’m staying for other reasons (mainly for its decentralized nature).
Anyways, I love the work that you’ve done and that you’re still doing here in the fediverse. I hope we can keep you around for as long as possible!