I'm finding the recent Veritasium videos are a bit weird... they mention a recent "thing 1", then do a super-deep historical dive into a somewhat related "thing 2" (presenting it as "the origins of thing 1").

This one [1] is "The Secret Spy Tech Inside Every Credit Card", where they briefly poke at NFC and then wind back to talk about the Soviet's listening device, gifted to the US Ambassador in 1945 [2].

They explain in some detail how the device works, showing it as what many woud recognise as Frequency Modulation, before calling it Amplitude Modulation(?!)

... the Wiki page states "the membrane and the post formed a variable capacitor acting as a condenser microphone and providing amplitude modulation (AM), with parasitic frequency modulation (FM) for the re-radiated signal", which is... I mean... okay, I guess... but isn't any FM broadcast actually AM too by this definition?

1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSJY3DvnybE

2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_(listening_device)

@attie isn't the channel owned by some weird conglomerate now?

@gsuberland @attie it is, and it's "a good thing" according to the video describing it!

tbh Derek deserves a break tho.

@xabean @attie I'm cool with him having a break, I'm less cool with using the channel's reputation as a vehicle to deliver content that cheapens it.
@xabean @attie I may be somewhat of an outlier in terms of how deeply annoyed I am by anything in the category of "education-shaped but not actually that educational" though.
@gsuberland @attie I legit wonder how they had so many technical people *in* the video, and either chose not to spot-check the video with them, or they all gave it a 👍
@gsuberland @attie it'd be like having huygensoptics in a video about the hubble telescope, and then be all "Yeah, the magnetosphere fucked up the mirror because it's made of aluminum, because, ya know, magnets."
@xabean @attie I'm still on the fence about HuygensOptics. his stuff is mostly cool, but some of it feels... a bit fringe? I didn't really notice at first but then he talked about something I knew about and it confused me, and in the process of trying to figure out why it wasn't lining up I ended up stumbling into a conversation between very qualified physics people who were like "this is some crank theory nonsense, what the hell is he even talking about".
@xabean @attie so now I'm wary about the rest of it because once someone demonstrates those sorts of leanings it's hard to not call the rest into question.
@xabean @attie which is deeply frustrating because his stuff is unique, well presented, and right up my alley.