Fucking based, not giving them an inch. #systemd should learn from this and not enable this crap, not even *signalling* a teeny tiny amount of support.

Wonder what #Motorola will do about this, I don't think they like this. But who cares, doing the right thing rarely makes the maximum amount of profit.
#GrapheneOS #Android #Linux #privacy #security

@Natanox This is good, though I'm switching to a Linux- based phone later this year because Android slowly becomes hell as a whole
@clumsy @Natanox Using GNU/Linux with mobile desktop environment is not more secure, private, stable or fast than OS based on AOSP like GrapheneOS. And Android is Linux distribution too.
@a53bdb @Natanox I want to have full control of my device and not have to verify my sex by camera scan in 2029 thank you
@clumsy @Natanox No, it won’t ask for anything. Having full control like root access is not necessary unless you’re OS developer and the device is for debugging only.
@a53bdb @Natanox It's already asking in other countries so I might as well just take the easy way out. And I prefer to APT install stuff without any cockblocks rather than having to fuck around Google Play store or APK signing or whatever bullshit there is in Android
@clumsy @Natanox There are many private app stores like Accrescent. Both Debian and AOSP have to face the same laws. I don’t know what you are talking about, installing apps on Android distributions is much more convenient than GNU/Linux distributions. That means you don’t have to worry about bricking your devices(dependencies) and signing(security).

@a53bdb @clumsy Maimuaika just said they don't want to use some app store. They want to go "sudo apt <package" and be fine.

Also your argument is wildly misleading because it's *technically* correct, but AOSP is maintained (and constantly neutered) by a megacorp while Debian is a trusted community project.

@Natanox @clumsy Maintainers’ locations don’t affect security of the project. when a way is safer and faster, it is recommended in my opinion.