Fucking based, not giving them an inch. #systemd should learn from this and not enable this crap, not even *signalling* a teeny tiny amount of support.

Wonder what #Motorola will do about this, I don't think they like this. But who cares, doing the right thing rarely makes the maximum amount of profit.
#GrapheneOS #Android #Linux #privacy #security

@Natanox This is good, though I'm switching to a Linux- based phone later this year because Android slowly becomes hell as a whole
@clumsy @Natanox Using GNU/Linux with mobile desktop environment is not more secure, private, stable or fast than OS based on AOSP like GrapheneOS. And Android is Linux distribution too.
@a53bdb @clumsy Is that so?
https://keepandroidopen.org/
AOSP is still in the hands of Google and the repo is awfully locked down. Maimuaika is right to switch, I'll do it myself if I can (have to change a few things and get the money before).
Keep Android Open

Advocating for Android as a free, open platform for everyone to build apps on.

@Natanox @clumsy Developer verification is a part of Google Mobile Service, not AOSP. The same policy is done by macOS years ago, it doesn’t make Android closed in my opinion. The delay of security patches does affect security of AOSP distributions, but the delay of AOSP doesn’t affect much.