Adrian SampsonMar 10
Because I have poor self control, I made a thing to avoid looking at those increasingly terrible ACM Digital Library pages. Introducing Analog Library: https://al.radbox.org
Analog Library Premium Edition™

Show threadmattpd2d ago
@adrian Thanks! BTW, am I the only one getting "Abstract:
Data missing." with https://al.radbox.org/doi/10.1145/3779212.3790241? It does show up on https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3779212.3790241, FWIW
Triton-Sanitizer: A Fast and Device-Agnostic Memory Sanitizer for Triton with Rich Diagnostic Context

Show threadAdrian Sampson

@mattpd ah, thanks, yes, I had noticed something wrong with ASPLOS 2026 papers in particular: https://codeberg.org/samps/analog-library/issues/22

shouldn’t be too hard to fix, thankfully

Fall back to Semantic Scholar API for some abstracts

At least at the moment, the ASPLOS 2026 papers don't have abstracts in Crossref, but they are available from Semantic Scholar. For example: https://al.radbox.org/doi/10.1145/3779212.3790166 https://api.semanticscholar.org/graph/v1/paper/DOI:10.1145/3779212.3790166?fields=abstract

Codeberg.org
Mar 27 at 10:34pmWeb
Show threadmattpd2d ago
@adrian Ah, not just me, then! I'm blaming them wild ASPLOS folks taking ideas like the Asemantic Code Revolution too far! Thanks for the service in any case, this is a vast improvement over the ACM DL "experience" :-)
Show threadAdrian Sampson22h ago
@mattpd this should be in place! seems to work for some papers but not all https://codeberg.org/samps/analog-library/pulls/25
Get abstracts from Semantic Scholar API

Fixes #22, and partially addresses the IEEE papers in #10.

Codeberg.org
Show threadmattpd22h ago
@adrian That works, thanks!