“A Dutch court has ordered X and its AI chatbot Grok to immediately stop generating non-consensual sexualized imagery and child pornographic material in the Netherlands, imposing a penalty of €100,000 per day on each defendant for non-compliance.”

Good.

#fuckElon #ai #slop

https://www.techpolicy.press/dutch-court-orders-x-grok-to-stop-aigenerated-sexual-abuse-content/

Dutch Court Orders X, Grok to Stop AI-Generated Sexual Abuse Content

Dutch court bans Grok's nudify tool and hits xAI with €100,000-a-day fines in Europe's first binding injunction against an AI image generator.

Tech Policy Press

@drahardja

An internet calculator says that Elon Musk "makes" $163,000 a minute, to put the fine in context.

*Maybe* if it was $100 million a day.

BTW - this is why I say fines and fees are unjustifiable.

@johnzajac @drahardja Absolute fines are ineffective indeed, as it allows rich people to break the law without a relative significant financial penalty.

Finland, however, imposes fees relative to the perpetrators income, which is quite effective.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jun/06/finnish-businessman-hit-with-121000-speeding-fine

Finnish businessman hit with €121,000 speeding fine

Anders Wiklöf fell foul of system based on severity of offence and offender’s income

The Guardian

@Amorpheus @drahardja

Again, any fine-based legal mechanism commodifies lawbreaking, which is *intrinsically* corrupt and centers money over the social contract.

120,000 euro is a regretful night out to someone worth 350 million, if that.

@johnzajac @drahardja For speeding without damage, a few regretful nights should be punishment enough for any person.

When it comes to real damage, fines should be appropiate enough so that any of us would be ruined in case of ignoring the law any further.

If it comes to unrepairable damage, fines truly do not reflect the consequences caused on others, thus harsh actions should be taken.