Ich mag Quellenangaben in öffentlichen Statements!
Da kann ich wenigstens der Gedankengang nachverfolgen und die Quelle bewerten - außerdem stehen da manchmal auch noch mehr interessante Sachen drin.
Die Quelle ist auf englisch, der "Beleg" nur ein unbelegtes öffentliches Statement einer willkürlichen Organisation ...
URL-Ende: ".../?utm_source=copilot.com"
Was soll ich jetzt infrage stellen?
Die Quelle, die Information, die Motivation, die Kompetenz aller Beteiligten? 🤬
Ed: typo
Contrapoints after going on Bad Faith podcast
Spending Just 10 Minutes With AI Can Fry Your Brain, Researchers Find
https://gizmodo.com/spending-just-10-minutes-with-ai-can-fry-your-brain-researchers-find-2000755701
> According to a new study by researchers at Carnegie Mellon, MIT, Oxford, and UCLA, just a 10-minute session with an AI assistant can lead to users significantly abandoning their own capacity for reasoning.
Direct link https://ai-project-website.github.io/AI-assistance-reduces-persistence/
note to self: do not read comments on #microslop CEO's linkedin. we are leaving the age of dead internet theory and moving to the age of dead internet theorem.
just a load of AI-generated yes-men, beckoning a tsunami of #slop.

Great to bring GPT 5.5 Instant to M365 Copilot today. With quicker, clearer, and more accurate responses, you can get to useful answers with less back and forth. Also rolling out to Copilot Studio and Foundry. All part of our focus on providing you more model choice across work, agents, and apps. Read more: https://lnkd.in/ghQdyNQG | 67 comments on LinkedIn
RE: https://hachyderm.io/@mitchellh/116533830933889307
Throw enough shit at the walls to see what sticks? I do see his point about generating test cases for an API prior to refactoring, likely to have code using it in unintended ways… but I’m not keen #GenAI #slop
Hasan be like "Dont organize into a 3rd party, instead work inside the Genocide Party and change them from the inside"