The Dutch version of The Onion with a piece about a Dodge RAM owner moaning about €200 to refuel.
The Dutch version of The Onion with a piece about a Dodge RAM owner moaning about €200 to refuel.
Ditto the Australian version "The shovel".
https://theshovel.com.au/2026/03/18/dickhead-with-ute-taller-than-himself-not-so-smug-about-it-now/
@MrAndrewD @notjustbikes Ah, and ute refers to utility vehicle I see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ute_(vehicle)
"a term used in Australia and New Zealand to describe vehicles with a tonneau behind the passenger compartment, that can be driven with a regular driver's licence."
@MrAndrewD @rrustema020 @notjustbikes that vehicle should not be allowed on the public road. It’s a child killer.
Thankfully it would not be allowed to be sold I n the EU
@dneary @peterbrown @MrAndrewD @notjustbikes And recently I found out that small business owners use the costs of such a monstertruck as a way to bring the profits of their one man company down so they are taxed less.
They need a car for their tools and materials anyway and now they get more pleasure and status out of it.
Their job by itself gives less of that? And they like to Dodge taxes just like their big hero entrepreneurs?
@peterbrown @dneary @MrAndrewD @notjustbikes
With disallowing those against tax you mean that they can't be used as costs to reduce taxable profits?
Not a native speaker, and not tax savy, so I don't know 'against tax' as an expression.
@dneary @peterbrown @MrAndrewD @notjustbikes Right, I understand you correctly now.
And I can think of something like the size, shape and weight of a category of cars similar to the Mercedes Vito as legit for a business.
The rear windows should be blinded etc.
@dneary @peterbrown @MrAndrewD @notjustbikes
Right, whatever rule, it should be extremely simple to roll out.
Fair, but with minimal filing burdens. Nothing at all would meet that requirement.
@rrustema020 @dneary @MrAndrewD @notjustbikes it’s not complicated. There are expenses which are allowable and there are expenses which are not. Just add anything that you can drive on a car licence to the list of expenses which are not allowable
Simples!
@dneary @peterbrown @MrAndrewD @notjustbikes
Please explain this to a person like me who last took a taxi years ago, last ordered take out during the pandemic (a bicyclist delivered it) and who is a big fan of public transport, bicycling, and renting vehicles.
To me it sounds great to make these services more expensive, it will benefit the alternatives. But I could be wrong.
@dneary @rrustema020 @MrAndrewD @notjustbikes many taxi drivers will be affected and will increase prices but the majority of delivery drivers on bicycles and motorbikes do not earn enough to pay any tax at all so the effect will be zero.
But there is quite a constituency of workers who use cars but don’t really need to and they get them tax free. A wealthy country is not one where everybody has a car, but where the rich use public transport.
@peterbrown @dneary @MrAndrewD @notjustbikes
At least in Amsterdam taxi drivers are complaining about the low prices and the abundance of taxis. They all want others to stop with this profession, stop driving a taxi, so prices can go up.
The boss of the major taxi company TCA once explained to me that this profession is the most attractive job if you have zero qualifications. She added that she repeatedly sees them make extremely bad choices as entrepreneurs.
Less taxis is good.
@dneary @rrustema020 @peterbrown @MrAndrewD
You will also make it significantly more difficult to properly fund public transportation if the alternatives are artificially cheap through subsidies and tax breaks.
Cars are extremely harmful to society. They should not receive any subsidies of any kind at all.
@rrustema020 @notjustbikes I've been making the local petrolheads annoyed by replying to any thread about petrol prices with the change so far in electricity prices.
Small pleasures.