"Canada rejected her permanent residence application. Her job duties were made up — by Immigration’s AI reviewer"

Added wiring and assembling control to expected job duties... She's a doctoral researcher in the immunology of aging.

I'm really hoping that this sets a legal precedence for the standard of the duty of care that the government is held to when using technology that does not care for reality.

https://www.thestar.com/gift-redeem?t=2a2f2922-489d-47cb-b5ff-36b188263d9a

#cdnpoli

Gift-redeem

Toronto Star
@mayintoronto It is terrifying that a government would be using AI.
@CStamp @mayintoronto I think it depend for what they are using what kind of AI.
@OutOfSpace @mayintoronto I can't think of a use that doesn't come with a lot of risk and a lot of frustration for users and people who need a person to talk to.
@CStamp @mayintoronto me neither, but I am not an adminiatration person. there might be good cases, who knows. I think we have to treat the current AI as what it is: An improved search engine, although a very expensive one in energy consumption. All the rest is just marketing.
@OutOfSpace @mayintoronto It's not even that. It give errors, so you don't know if you should believe the search.
@CStamp @mayintoronto I agree, you have to be critical. But you have to critical with Google and other search engines or any source of information too. If a moron uses AI it's a bad thing. But a moron itself is a bad thing. Given the context you were thinking of and referring to in your first post: AI should not be used in that context.
@OutOfSpace @mayintoronto It should also not replace human judgement or human customer support.
@CStamp @OutOfSpace @mayintoronto They are using AI to speed up a pro forma rejection of anyone from a population they deem as “surplus” or “unimportant.”
@MisuseCase @CStamp @mayintoronto Yeah, unaccaptable. with or without AI.