Idea for a different way of doing project grants. Make decisions about which projects to fund based only on the questions asked, and then require successful grantees to go through a multi round post decision review process to sharpen up the methods and make sure they can answer the question.

One of the main reasons I find grant proposals and reviews unsatisfactory is the incentives are there for applicants to hide methodological issues which limits the collaborative value of the review. In this version, once you get the funding you want to bare all to get the best feedback to improve.

#metaresearch #academicchatter #science

@neuralreckoning

I can imagine this could be so constructive! Great idea!

@brembs I would actually be really enthusiastic to do this, unlike standard grant review which fills me with existential dread.

@neuralreckoning

Me too!

In the meetings after the decision, you'd have only 'winners'. Great atmosphere!