So it hit me today that we've got a rudimentary Universal Translator with AI now, and that got me thinking.

I live in a multicultural city where there's a high chance of hearing several different languages when you walk down the street. I've noticed it's a kind of privacy layer in a lot of cases, I can sit on a bus, someone will answer their phone, and if they speak in a language I don't understand it's easier to let it sink into the background noise rather than draw my focus. And often people will talk amongst themselves in their own language, confident that hardly anyone or no-one will be understanding what they're saying, able to occupy to their own little bubble.

So imagine now being in a near future dystopian science fiction setting where people invent their own language, trained a portable LLM and recording device on the data, and then allowing tiered access permissions as a kind of encryption layer. The recording device can be set to only pick up your own voice, or be directly embedded to detect thought patterns that constantly update the model in real time. Other people need access with a key you decide to share. There's a total block setting so nobody can access. Strangers might start from scratch, training each other's models from no data with basic permissions. Acquaintances or casual friends might have partial, lossy access. Full, high resolution access is reserved only for the ones you trust, a kind of instantaneous deep sync. Misunderstanding is default, understanding is opt-in.

There might be a family language that children grow up learning before diverging and modifying that into their own language. Or creating one that's entirely their own.

Institutions might have their own language, separate from the personal language, one employees are required to have on in full resolution while on site together (or remotely networking) with company restrictions and filters in place. You'd be perfectly understood, but within an approved framework. There might be legal requirements to give employees enough time off work that they don't become 'absorbed' into the company model. But some shady employers might try to game the system by encouraging habits and phrases that persist even when the company AI is technically off. Becoming 'a company man' or 'married to the job' gets taken to another level.

Underworld organisations would go hard on the assimilation aspect. A little bit like the 'Ghost Hacking' in Ghost in the Shell, but less of a one-time invasion, rather opting in to something more insidious.

Therapy in this setting would be more like de-programming, on the level of meaning structures rather than just beliefs. In extreme cases, brain surgery might be required... which some might refuse because it would be like losing who they are. The risk would be losing memories and personality traits that grew around that system.

Another thing that's already happening now that LLMs are part of the world, is that people are introducing typos and spelling errors to signal humanity. So in the near-future setting, this might be called 'grains' or 'granularity' to make oneself harder to model. Going 'low-grain' would mean someone is assimilated into an imposed model. There would be a constant low key awareness that one could be recorded at any time.

#writing #scifi #fiction #AI #LLM #sciencefiction #dystopia

@vesperys reminds me of the House battle languages (spoken and signed) in Dune, and I think the Bene Gesserit and other orgs had their own as well. But without the AI/LLM aspect, of course, because Butlerian Jihad. Given that training someone in the language means training them in reusable military secrets, they seemed to be a hallmark of orgs and personnel where loyalty is assumed to be lifelong and no one leaves except in a hearse.
@ljwrites Fascinating, I've not actually read Dune yet but I think I'll bump it up to the high priority section of the list, cheers
@vesperys languages are more passing/background aspects of the Dune worldbuilding than centrally explored, though they are not negligible. Some of Ted Chiang's stories go into more depth about language and cognitive structure/ability.
@ljwrites Oh, the author of Arrival, right on! Absolutely loved the film adaption, very curious to read the source
@vesperys I've only read the story (Story of Your Life) and not seen the movie, but I heard they're very different! I think Understand and to an extent The Evolution of Human Science dealt with language and communication, too.
@ljwrites It'll be interesting to compare, the movie hit me like a dump trump to the heart. There's a scene right at the beginning when she's in the lecture theater... the establishment of grief and isolation as a theme is written on the actress' face as the camera lingers on her expression, even though the story is about connection on many levels. She really did a fantastic job.
@vesperys You've certainly made me more interested in watching the movie! I hope you enjoy the story 💚
@ljwrites I'm thinking they wouldn't need to physically kill anyone in a Mafia-like criminal organisation... just shut off the AI and lock them out and they'll suffer an excruciating ego-death.