@UkeleleEric @zleap @Silversnapples It seems to me that the Equality Act 2010 gives them two options: not to discriminate about membership, or with justification, claim an exception under the Act, which the Supreme Court ruling would seem to mean requires them to apply the “biological sex” criterion.
There are two things wrong here: firstly I would argue it’s wrong to put the Guides in the position of having to make that choice. It’s clear to me that this demonstrates that it’s bad law, and I remain baffled that the immediate response by politicians wasn’t that they had to change it ASAP.
1/2